I know how each of them can be converted to one another but never really understood what their applications are. The usual infix operation is quite readable, but where does it fail which led to inception of prefix and postfix notation
Infix expressions are readable and solvable by humans. We can easily distinguish the order of operators, and also can use the parenthesis to solve that part first during solving mathematical expressions. The computer cannot differentiate the operators and parenthesis easily, that's why postfix conversion is needed.
Prefix: An expression is called the prefix expression if the operator appears in the expression before the operands. Simply of the form (operator operand1 operand2). Postfix: An expression is called the postfix expression if the operator appears in the expression after the operands.
Infix notation is easy to read for humans, whereas pre-/postfix notation is easier to parse for a machine. The big advantage in pre-/postfix notation is that there never arise any questions like operator precedence.
For example, consider the infix expression 1 # 2 $ 3
. Now, we don't know what those operators mean, so there are two possible corresponding postfix expressions: 1 2 # 3 $
and 1 2 3 $ #
. Without knowing the rules governing the use of these operators, the infix expression is essentially worthless.
Or, to put it in more general terms: it is possible to restore the original (parse) tree from a pre-/postfix expression without any additional knowledge, but the same isn't true for infix expressions.
Postfix notation, also known as RPN, is very easy to process left-to-right. An operand is pushed onto a stack; an operator pops its operand(s) from the stack and pushes the result. Little or no parsing is necessary. It's used by Forth and by some calculators (HP calculators are noted for using RPN).
Prefix notation is nearly as easy to process; it's used in Lisp.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With