I came across PECS (short for Producer extends
and Consumer super
) while reading up on generics.
Can someone explain to me how to use PECS to resolve confusion between extends
and super
?
super is a lower bound, and extends is an upper bound.
super T denotes an unknown type that is a supertype of T (or T itself; remember that the supertype relation is reflexive). It is the dual of the bounded wildcards we've been using, where we use ? extends T to denote an unknown type that is a subtype of T .
The question mark (?) is known as the wildcard in generic programming. It represents an unknown type. The wildcard can be used in a variety of situations such as the type of a parameter, field, or local variable; sometimes as a return type.
Generics add that type of safety feature. We will discuss that type of safety feature in later examples. Generics in Java are similar to templates in C++. For example, classes like HashSet, ArrayList, HashMap, etc., use generics very well.
tl;dr: "PECS" is from the collection's point of view. If you are only pulling items from a generic collection, it is a producer and you should use extends
; if you are only stuffing items in, it is a consumer and you should use super
. If you do both with the same collection, you shouldn't use either extends
or super
.
Suppose you have a method that takes as its parameter a collection of things, but you want it to be more flexible than just accepting a Collection<Thing>
.
Case 1: You want to go through the collection and do things with each item.
Then the list is a producer, so you should use a Collection<? extends Thing>
.
The reasoning is that a Collection<? extends Thing>
could hold any subtype of Thing
, and thus each element will behave as a Thing
when you perform your operation. (You actually cannot add anything (except null) to a Collection<? extends Thing>
, because you cannot know at runtime which specific subtype of Thing
the collection holds.)
Case 2: You want to add things to the collection.
Then the list is a consumer, so you should use a Collection<? super Thing>
.
The reasoning here is that unlike Collection<? extends Thing>
, Collection<? super Thing>
can always hold a Thing
no matter what the actual parameterized type is. Here you don't care what is already in the list as long as it will allow a Thing
to be added; this is what ? super Thing
guarantees.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With