I'm working on a project where all conversions from int
to String
are done like this:
int i = 5; String strI = "" + i;
I'm not familiar with Java.
Is this usual practice or is something wrong, as I suppose?
In Python an integer can be converted into a string using the built-in str() function. The str() function takes in any python data type and converts it into a string.
Conversion of an integer into a string by using to_string() method. The to_string() method accepts a single integer and converts the integer value or other data type value into a string.
The next method in this list to convert int to string in C++ is by using the to_string() function. This function is used to convert not only the integer but numerical values of any data type into a string. The to_string() method is included in the header file of the class string, i.e., <string> or <cstring>.
Normal ways would be Integer.toString(i)
or String.valueOf(i)
.
The concatenation will work, but it is unconventional and could be a bad smell as it suggests the author doesn't know about the two methods above (what else might they not know?).
Java has special support for the + operator when used with strings (see the documentation) which translates the code you posted into:
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(); sb.append(""); sb.append(i); String strI = sb.toString();
at compile-time. It's slightly less efficient (sb.append()
ends up calling Integer.getChars()
, which is what Integer.toString()
would've done anyway), but it works.
To answer Grodriguez's comment: ** No, the compiler doesn't optimise out the empty string in this case - look:
simon@lucifer:~$ cat TestClass.java public class TestClass { public static void main(String[] args) { int i = 5; String strI = "" + i; } } simon@lucifer:~$ javac TestClass.java && javap -c TestClass Compiled from "TestClass.java" public class TestClass extends java.lang.Object{ public TestClass(); Code: 0: aload_0 1: invokespecial #1; //Method java/lang/Object."<init>":()V 4: return public static void main(java.lang.String[]); Code: 0: iconst_5 1: istore_1
Initialise the StringBuilder:
2: new #2; //class java/lang/StringBuilder 5: dup 6: invokespecial #3; //Method java/lang/StringBuilder."<init>":()V
Append the empty string:
9: ldc #4; //String 11: invokevirtual #5; //Method java/lang/StringBuilder.append: (Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/lang/StringBuilder;
Append the integer:
14: iload_1 15: invokevirtual #6; //Method java/lang/StringBuilder.append: (I)Ljava/lang/StringBuilder;
Extract the final string:
18: invokevirtual #7; //Method java/lang/StringBuilder.toString: ()Ljava/lang/String; 21: astore_2 22: return }
There's a proposal and ongoing work to change this behaviour, targetted for JDK 9.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With