It's common in C++ to name member variables with some kind of prefix to denote the fact that they're member variables, rather than local variables or parameters. If you've come from an MFC background, you'll probably use m_foo
. I've also seen myFoo
occasionally.
C# (or possibly just .NET) seems to recommend using just an underscore, as in _foo
. Is this allowed by the C++ standard?
Characters in identifiers The first character in an identifier must be a letter or the _ (underscore) character; however, beginning identifiers with an underscore is considered poor programming style. The compiler distinguishes between uppercase and lowercase letters in identifiers.
Yes they are all valid.
The rules (which did not change in C++11):
std
namespace is reserved. (You are allowed to add template specializations, though.) From the 2003 C++ Standard:
17.4.3.1.2 Global names [lib.global.names]
Certain sets of names and function signatures are always reserved to the implementation:
- Each name that contains a double underscore (
__
) or begins with an underscore followed by an uppercase letter (2.11) is reserved to the implementation for any use.- Each name that begins with an underscore is reserved to the implementation for use as a name in the global namespace.165
165) Such names are also reserved in namespace
::std
(17.4.3.1).
Because C++ is based on the C standard (1.1/2, C++03) and C99 is a normative reference (1.2/1, C++03) these also apply, from the 1999 C Standard:
7.1.3 Reserved identifiers
Each header declares or defines all identifiers listed in its associated subclause, and optionally declares or defines identifiers listed in its associated future library directions subclause and identifiers which are always reserved either for any use or for use as file scope identifiers.
- All identifiers that begin with an underscore and either an uppercase letter or another underscore are always reserved for any use.
- All identifiers that begin with an underscore are always reserved for use as identifiers with file scope in both the ordinary and tag name spaces.
- Each macro name in any of the following subclauses (including the future library directions) is reserved for use as specified if any of its associated headers is included; unless explicitly stated otherwise (see 7.1.4).
- All identifiers with external linkage in any of the following subclauses (including the future library directions) are always reserved for use as identifiers with external linkage.154
- Each identifier with file scope listed in any of the following subclauses (including the future library directions) is reserved for use as a macro name and as an identifier with file scope in the same name space if any of its associated headers is included.
No other identifiers are reserved. If the program declares or defines an identifier in a context in which it is reserved (other than as allowed by 7.1.4), or defines a reserved identifier as a macro name, the behavior is undefined.
If the program removes (with
#undef
) any macro definition of an identifier in the first group listed above, the behavior is undefined.154) The list of reserved identifiers with external linkage includes
errno
,math_errhandling
,setjmp
, andva_end
.
Other restrictions might apply. For example, the POSIX standard reserves a lot of identifiers that are likely to show up in normal code:
E
followed a digit or uppercase letter: is
or to
followed by a lowercase letter LC_
followed by an uppercase letter f
or l
are reserved SIG
followed by an uppercase letter are reserved SIG_
followed by an uppercase letter are reserved str
, mem
, or wcs
followed by a lowercase letter are reserved PRI
or SCN
followed by any lowercase letter or X
are reserved _t
are reserved While using these names for your own purposes right now might not cause a problem, they do raise the possibility of conflict with future versions of that standard.
Personally I just don't start identifiers with underscores. New addition to my rule: Don't use double underscores anywhere, which is easy as I rarely use underscore.
After doing research on this article I no longer end my identifiers with _t
as this is reserved by the POSIX standard.
The rule about any identifier ending with _t
surprised me a lot. I think that is a POSIX standard (not sure yet) looking for clarification and official chapter and verse. This is from the GNU libtool manual, listing reserved names.
CesarB provided the following link to the POSIX 2004 reserved symbols and notes 'that many other reserved prefixes and suffixes ... can be found there'. The POSIX 2008 reserved symbols are defined here. The restrictions are somewhat more nuanced than those above.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With