Objects can be nested inside other objects. Each nested object must have a unique access path. The same field name can occur in nested objects in the same document.
Nested JSON is simply a JSON file with a fairly big portion of its values being other JSON objects. Compared with Simple JSON, Nested JSON provides higher clarity in that it decouples objects into different layers, making it easier to maintain.
JSON has 3 basic types: booleans, numbers, strings, combined using arrays and objects to build complex structures. Go's terminology calls marshal the process of generating a JSON string from a data structure, and unmarshal the act of parsing JSON to a data structure.
Is there a way to unmarshal the nested bar property and assign it directly to a struct property without creating a nested struct?
No, encoding/json cannot do the trick with ">some>deep>childnode" like encoding/xml can do. Nested structs is the way to go.
Like what Volker mentioned, nested structs is the way to go. But if you really do not want nested structs, you can override the UnmarshalJSON func.
https://play.golang.org/p/dqn5UdqFfJt
type A struct {
FooBar string // takes foo.bar
FooBaz string // takes foo.baz
More string
}
func (a *A) UnmarshalJSON(b []byte) error {
var f interface{}
json.Unmarshal(b, &f)
m := f.(map[string]interface{})
foomap := m["foo"]
v := foomap.(map[string]interface{})
a.FooBar = v["bar"].(string)
a.FooBaz = v["baz"].(string)
a.More = m["more"].(string)
return nil
}
Please ignore the fact that I'm not returning a proper error. I left that out for simplicity.
UPDATE: Correctly retrieving "more" value.
This is an example of how to unmarshall JSON responses from the Safebrowsing v4 API sbserver proxy server: https://play.golang.org/p/4rGB5da0Lt
// this example shows how to unmarshall JSON requests from the Safebrowsing v4 sbserver
package main
import (
"fmt"
"log"
"encoding/json"
)
// response from sbserver POST request
type Results struct {
Matches []Match
}
// nested within sbserver response
type Match struct {
ThreatType string
PlatformType string
ThreatEntryType string
Threat struct {
URL string
}
}
func main() {
fmt.Println("Hello, playground")
// sample POST request
// curl -X POST -H 'Content-Type: application/json'
// -d '{"threatInfo": {"threatEntries": [{"url": "http://testsafebrowsing.appspot.com/apiv4/ANY_PLATFORM/MALWARE/URL/"}]}}'
// http://127.0.0.1:8080/v4/threatMatches:find
// sample JSON response
jsonResponse := `{"matches":[{"threatType":"MALWARE","platformType":"ANY_PLATFORM","threatEntryType":"URL","threat":{"url":"http://testsafebrowsing.appspot.com/apiv4/ANY_PLATFORM/MALWARE/URL/"}}]}`
res := &Results{}
err := json.Unmarshal([]byte(jsonResponse), res)
if(err!=nil) {
log.Fatal(err)
}
fmt.Printf("%v\n",res)
fmt.Printf("\tThreat Type: %s\n",res.Matches[0].ThreatType)
fmt.Printf("\tPlatform Type: %s\n",res.Matches[0].PlatformType)
fmt.Printf("\tThreat Entry Type: %s\n",res.Matches[0].ThreatEntryType)
fmt.Printf("\tURL: %s\n",res.Matches[0].Threat.URL)
}
Yes. With gjson all you have to do now is:
bar := gjson.Get(json, "foo.bar")
bar
could be a struct property if you like. Also, no maps.
What about anonymous fields? I'm not sure if that will constitute a "nested struct" but it's cleaner than having a nested struct declaration. What if you want to reuse the nested element elsewhere?
type NestedElement struct{
someNumber int `json:"number"`
someString string `json:"string"`
}
type BaseElement struct {
NestedElement `json:"bar"`
}
Assign the values of nested json
to struct until you know the underlying type of json keys:-
package main
import (
"encoding/json"
"fmt"
)
// Object
type Object struct {
Foo map[string]map[string]string `json:"foo"`
More string `json:"more"`
}
func main(){
someJSONString := []byte(`{"foo":{ "bar": "1", "baz": "2" }, "more": "text"}`)
var obj Object
err := json.Unmarshal(someJSONString, &obj)
if err != nil{
fmt.Println(err)
}
fmt.Println("jsonObj", obj)
}
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With