Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

R colSums By Group

Tags:

r

plyr

In the following matrix dataset:

       1  2   3   4   5  
1950   7 20  21  15  61  
1951   2 10   6  26  57  
1952  12 27  43  37  34  
1953  14 16  40  47  94  
1954   2 17  62 113 101  
1955   3  4  43  99 148  
1956   2 47  31  85  79  
1957  17  5  38 216 228  
1958  11 20  15  76  68  
1959  16 20  43  30 226  
1960   9 28  28  70 201  
1961   1 31 124  74 137  
1962  12 25  37  41 200  

I have been trying to calculate colSums by decade i.e., find sum the each column from 1950-1959 and then from 1960-69 and so on.

I tried tapply, ddply, etc but couldn't figure out something that would actually work.

like image 692
jitendra Avatar asked Jan 31 '12 17:01

jitendra


People also ask

How do I sum by group in R?

Group By Sum in R using dplyr You can use group_by() function along with the summarise() from dplyr package to find the group by sum in R DataFrame, group_by() returns the grouped_df ( A grouped Data Frame) and use summarise() on grouped df results to get the group by sum.

How do I group by multiple columns in R?

Group By Multiple Columns in R using dplyr Use group_by() function in R to group the rows in DataFrame by multiple columns (two or more), to use this function, you have to install dplyr first using install. packages('dplyr') and load it using library(dplyr) .

What does colSums do in R?

The colSums() function in R can be used to calculate the sum of the values in each column of a matrix or data frame in R. where: x: Name of the matrix or data frame. na.


1 Answers

First we set up the matrix used as input.

Lines <- "1  2   3   4   5  
1950   7 20  21  15  61  
1951   2 10   6  26  57  
1952  12 27  43  37  34  
1953  14 16  40  47  94  
1954   2 17  62 113 101  
1955   3  4  43  99 148  
1956   2 47  31  85  79  
1957  17  5  38 216 228  
1958  11 20  15  76  68  
1959  16 20  43  30 226  
1960   9 28  28  70 201  
1961   1 31 124  74 137  
1962  12 25  37  41 200  "
DF <- read.table(text = Lines, check.names = FALSE)
m <- as.matrix(DF)

Now, below, we show some alternative solutions. (1) seems the most flexible in that we can easily replace sum with other functions to get different effects but (2) is the shortest for this particular problem. Also note that there are some slight differences. (1) produces a data.frame while the other two produce a matrix.

1) aggregate

decade <- 10 * as.numeric(rownames(m)) %/% 10
m.ag <- aggregate(m, data.frame(decade), sum)

which gives this data.frame:

> m.ag
  decade  1   2   3   4    5
1   1950 86 186 342 744 1096
2   1960 22  84 189 185  538

2) rowsum This one is shorter. It produces a matrix result.

rowsum(m, decade)

3) split/sapply. This one produces a matrix as well. if we had DF we could replace as.data.frame(m) with DF shortening it slightly.

t(sapply(split(as.data.frame(m), decade), colSums))

EDIT: added solutions (2) and (3) Added some clarifications.

like image 135
G. Grothendieck Avatar answered Oct 20 '22 19:10

G. Grothendieck