I'm just building a test suite for a legacy Rails app. The simplecov
gem has been great for finding dark corners of the app which need test coverage (or which may be completely unused and OK to remove). I'm invoking simplecov
simply by including the following at the top of test/test_helper.rb
:
require 'simplecov'
SimpleCov.start('rails')
The problem is that this doesn't check all the code which is embedded in the templates. There is all kinds of junk in there, and I'm sure a lot of it could just be removed, but it would be really nice if a code-coverage tool could point me to the unused bits.
Some experimentation with Ruby 1.9's Coverage
library leads me to believe that it could only do the job if the templates were somehow pre-compiled to Ruby code, saved in Ruby source files, and then load
ed or require
d, rather than loading the compiled templates directly with eval
. OR, it might be possible to hack ERB to add logging statements to each line of each template during the compilation process.
Does anyone have any other ideas how to measure code coverage of ERB templates? Do you know of an already-made tool which can do this? (Or will I have to be the one to build and release it?)
See: How do I get coverage for view specs with rspec, rails, and simplecov?
The answer being, you can't:
https://github.com/colszowka/simplecov/issues/38
It's critical flaw that I hope someone will address. AFIK there is nothing better than simplecov for Ruby 1.9
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With