The following code compiles in Clang but does not in GCC:
template<typename T>
struct Widget
{
template<typename U>
void foo(U)
{
}
template<>
void foo(int*)
{
}
};
According to the C++ standard ([temp.expl.spec], paragraph 2):
An explicit specialization may be declared in any scope in which the corresponding primary template may be defined
Is this a bug in GCC and if so how can I find it in its bug tracker?
This is GCC's output:
prog.cc:13:14: error: explicit specialization in non-namespace scope 'struct Widget<T>'
template<>
^
I'm using GCC HEAD 8.0.1, with -std=c++2a
.
This should be a GCC bug. Full specialization should be allowed in any scope, including in class definition.
According to CWG 727, [temp.expl.spec] paragraph 2 was changed from
(emphasis mine)
An explicit specialization shall be declared in a namespace enclosing the specialized template. An explicit specialization whose declarator-id or class-head-name is not qualified shall be declared in the nearest enclosing namespace of the template, or, if the namespace is inline (10.3.1 [namespace.def]), any namespace from its enclosing namespace set. Such a declaration may also be a definition. If the declaration is not a definition, the specialization may be defined later (10.3.1.2 [namespace.memdef]).
to
(emphasis mine)
An explicit specialization may be declared in any scope in which the corresponding primary template may be defined (10.3.1.2 [namespace.memdef], 12.2 [class.mem], 17.6.2 [temp.mem]).
It seems GCC fails to follow this.
EDIT
I have reported the issue as Bug 85282.
If somebody is looking for a workaround till this is fixed in gcc:
It is possible to use std::is_same_v
and if constexpr
godbolt
template<typename T>
struct Widget
{
template<typename U>
void foo(U)
{
if constexpr (std::is_same_v<U, int*>) {
std::cout << "int*\n";
}
std::cout << "U\n";
}
};
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With