Erlang on a JVM/CLR

Question

I've just started reading Joe Armstrongs book on Erlang and listened to his excellent talk on Software Engineering Radio.

Its an interesting language/system and one whose time seems to have come around with the advent of multi-core machines.

My question is: what is there to stop it being ported to the JVM or CLR? I realise that both virtual machines aren't setup to run the lightweight processes that Erlang calls for - but couldn't these be simulated by threads? Could we see a lightweight or cutdown version of Erlang on a non Erlang VM?

Answer 1

You could not use JVM/CLR libraries, given their reliance on mutable objects.

Erlang exception handling is quite different from JVM and CLR exceptions, you would need to handle this somehow.

Implementing processes as threads would mean that any sizable Erlang system runs out of memory pretty fast (process size on my machine on creation: 1268 bytes, thread stack size in CLR: 1 MB) and communication between processes is much slower than in Erlang.

What you probably want is an Actor Model implementation on JVM or CLR.

Scala and Clojure have already been mentioned. In addition, there are many Actor implementations for JVM: Kilim, Functional Java, Jetlang, Actors Guild, ActorFoundry, and at least one for CLR: Retlang, which can be used from any JVM/CLR language.

Answer 2

For educational reasons, we are implementing a subset of ErlangVM for CLR. We were highly inspired by Kresten Krab Thorup and his project Erjang, a JVM based Erlang VM. Erjang uses kilim framework for representing lightweight processes, and it starts to attract attention.

Javalimit - Erjang's author blog.

Erjang repository

Answer 3

This is a well trod-discussion. Some context might be useful.

From the Erlang mailing list last November:

• The start of a long discussion thread

• continuing here

• and going a bit mental here

• and ending on Joe's contribution.

My contribution to the debate about Erlang on the JVM? No, not a good idea :(