Constructing minimal Haskell example on error-handling in the State Monad

Question

I'm twisting my brain into knots trying to understand how to combine the State monad with Maybe.

Let's start with a concrete (and intentionally trivial/unnecessary) example in which we use a State monad to find the sum of a list of numbers:

import Control.Monad.State

list :: [Int]
list = [1,4,5,6,7,0,3,2,1]

adder :: Int
adder = evalState addState list

addState :: State [Int] Int
addState = do
  ms <- get
  case ms of
    []     -> return 0
    (x:xs) -> put xs >> fmap (+x) addState

Cool.

Now let's modify it so that it returns a Nothing if the list contains the number 0. In other words, evalState addState' list should return Nothing (since list contains a 0). I thought it might look something like this...

addState' :: State [Int] (Maybe Int)
addState' = do
  ms <- get
  case ms of
    [] -> return (Just 0)
    (0:xs) -> return Nothing
    (x:xs) -> put xs >> fmap (fmap (+x)) addState'

...it works but I assume there's a better way to do this...

I've played around with StateT and MaybeT and I can't get them to work. I've looked at a couple of intros to Monad transformers but they either didn't touch on this particular combo (i.e., State + Maybe) or the examples were too complex for me to understand.

TL;DR: I'd appreciate if someone could show how to write this (admittedly trivial) piece of code using StateT and MaybeT (two examples). (I'm assuming it isn't possible to write this code without the use of transformers - is that incorrect?)

P.S. My understanding is that StateT is probably better suited for this example, but it would be helpful conceptually to see both examples, if not too much trouble.

Update: As pointed out by @Brenton Alker, my first version of the code above doesn't work because of simple typo (I was missing an apostrophe). In the interest of focusing the question on the use of StateT/MaybeT, I'm correcting the post above. Just wanted to include this note to give context to his post.

Answer 1

The type I would recommend using is:

StateT [Int] Maybe Int

A really simple way to use Maybe/MaybeT is to just call mzero whenever you want to fail and mplus whenever you want to recover from a failed computation. This works even if they are layered within other monad transformers.

Here's an example:

addState' :: StateT [Int] Maybe Int
addState' = do
  ms <- get
  case ms of
    []     -> return 0
    (0:xs) -> mzero
    (x:xs) -> put xs >> fmap (fmap (+x)) addState

-- This requires generalizing the type of `addState` to:
addState :: Monad m => StateT [Int] m Int

Notice that I wrote that in such a way that I didn't use any Maybe-specific operations. In fact, if you let the compiler infer the type signature it will deduce this more general type instead:

addState' :: MonadPlus m => StateT [Int] m Int

This works because StateT has the following MonadPlus instance:

instance MonadPlus m => MonadPlus (StateT s m) where ...

And Maybe will type-check as an instance of MonadPlus, which is why the above code works when we specialize m to Maybe.