It seems that this question was not discussed on stackoverflow before, save for Working With Nested XPath Predicates ... Refined where the solution not involving nested predicates was offered.
So I tried to write the oversimplified sample of what I'd like to get:
Input:
<root>
<shortOfSupply>
<food animal="doggie"/>
<food animal="horse"/>
</shortOfSupply>
<animalsDictionary>
<cage name="A" animal="kittie"/>
<cage name="B" animal="dog"/>
<cage name="C" animal="cow"/>
<cage name="D" animal="zebra"/>
</animals>
</root>
Output:
<root>
<hungryAnimals>
<cage name="B"/>
<cage name="D"/>
</hungryAnimals>
</root>
or, alternatively, if there is no intersections,
<root>
<everythingIsFine/>
</root>
And i want to get it using a nested predicates:
<xsl:template match="cage">
<cage>
<xsl:attribute name="name">
<xsl:value-of select="@name"/>
</xsl:attribute>
</cage>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="/root/animalsDictionary">
<xsl:choose>
<!-- in <food> in <cage> -->
<xsl:when test="cage[/root/shortOfSupply/food[ext:isEqualAnimals(./@animal, ?????/@animal)]]">
<hungryAnimals>
<xsl:apply-templates select="cage[/root/shortOfSupply/food[ext:isEqualAnimals(@animal, ?????/@animal)]]"/>
</hungryAnimals>
</xsl:when>
<xsl:otherwise>
<everythingIsFine/>
</xsl:otherwise>
</xsl:choose>
</xsl:template>
So what should i write in place of that ?????
?
I know i could rewrite the entire stylesheet using one more template and extensive usage of variables/params, but it makes even this stylesheet significantly more complex, let alone the real stylesheet i have for real problem.
It is written in XPath reference that the dot .
sign means the current context node, but it doesn't tell whether there is any possibility to get the node of context before that; and i just can't believe XPath is missing this obvious feature.
XPath 2.0 one-liner:
for $a in /*/animalsDictionary/cage
return
if(/*/shortOfSupply/*[my:isA($a/@animal, @animal)])
then $a
else ()
When applied on the provided XML document selects:
<cage name="B"/>
<cage name="D"/>
One cannot use a single XPath 1.0 expression to find that a given cage contains a hungry animal.
Here is an XSLT solution (XSLT 2.0 is used only to avoid using an extension function for the comparison -- in an XSLT 1.0 solution one will use an extension function for the comparison and the xxx:node-set()
extension to test if the RTF produced by applying templates in the body of the variable contains any child element):
<xsl:stylesheet version="2.0"
xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"
xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns:my="my:my" exclude-result-prefixes="xs my">
<xsl:output omit-xml-declaration="yes" indent="yes"/>
<my:Dict>
<a genName="doggie">
<name>dog</name>
<name>bulldog</name>
<name>puppy</name>
</a>
<a genName="horse">
<name>horse</name>
<name>zebra</name>
<name>pony</name>
</a>
<a genName="cat">
<name>kittie</name>
<name>kitten</name>
</a>
</my:Dict>
<xsl:variable name="vDict" select=
"document('')/*/my:Dict/a"/>
<xsl:template match="/">
<root>
<xsl:variable name="vhungryCages">
<xsl:apply-templates select=
"/*/animalsDictionary/cage"/>
</xsl:variable>
<xsl:choose>
<xsl:when test="$vhungryCages/*">
<hungryAnimals>
<xsl:copy-of select="$vhungryCages"/>
</hungryAnimals>
</xsl:when>
<xsl:otherwise>
<everythingIsFine/>
</xsl:otherwise>
</xsl:choose>
</root>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="cage">
<xsl:if test="
/*/shortOfSupply/*[my:isA(current()/@animal,@animal)]">
<cage name="{@name}"/>
</xsl:if>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:function name="my:isA" as="xs:boolean">
<xsl:param name="pSpecName" as="xs:string"/>
<xsl:param name="pGenName" as="xs:string"/>
<xsl:sequence select=
"$pSpecName = $vDict[@genName = $pGenName]/name"/>
</xsl:function>
</xsl:stylesheet>
When this transformation is applied on the provided XML document (corrected to be well-formed):
<root>
<shortOfSupply>
<food animal="doggie"/>
<food animal="horse"/>
</shortOfSupply>
<animalsDictionary>
<cage name="A" animal="kittie"/>
<cage name="B" animal="dogs"/>
<cage name="C" animal="cow"/>
<cage name="D" animal="zebras"/>
</animalsDictionary>
</root>
the wanted, correct result is produced:
<root>
<hungryAnimals>
<cage name="B"/>
<cage name="D"/>
</hungryAnimals>
</root>
Explanation: Do note the use of the XSLT current()
function.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With