I pretty don't understand why this test :
http://jsperf.com/push-method-vs-setting-via-key
Shows that
a.push(Math.random());
is over ten times slower than
a[i] = Math.random();
Could you explain why this is the case ? What magic "push" do that make it so slow ? (or so slow compared to other valid method of doing that).
EDIT
NOTE: The push test is biased. I increase size of the array every iteration! Read carefully accepted answer!
Unshift is slower than push because it also needs to unshift all the elements to the left once the first element is added.
The push() method adds one or more elements to the end of an array and returns the new length of the array.
The Complete Full-Stack JavaScript Course! Both the methods are used to add elements to the array. But the only difference is unshift() method adds the element at the start of the array whereas push() adds the element at the end of the array.
concat performs at 0.40 ops/sec, while . push performs at 378 ops/sec. push is 945x faster than concat ! This difference might not be linear, but it is already is already significant at this small scale.
Could you explain why this is the case?
Because your test is flawed. The push
does always append to the existing a
array making it much larger, while the second test does only use the first 1000 indices.
Using the setup
is not enough here, you would have to reset the a
array before every for-loop: http://jsperf.com/push-method-vs-setting-via-key/3.
Apart from that, the method call to push
might have a little overhead, and determining the current array length might need additional time compared to using the index of the for-loop.
Usually there is no reason not to use push
- the method is there for exactly that operation and makes some code easier to read. While a few people think one version is faster than the other, both are equally optimized in browsers. See Why is array.push sometimes faster than array[n] = value? and Using the push method or .length when adding to array? - results vary so wide that it's actually irrelevant. Use what is better to understand.
That's simply because Google decided to put more work into optimising array indexing than optimising the push
method in Chrome.
If you look at the test results now that a few more people have tried it, you see that the performance differes quite a lot between different browsers, and even between different versions of the same browser.
Nowadays browsers compile the Javascript code, which means that the browser turns the code into something that is much faster to run that interpreted Javascript. What the compiler does with the code determines how different ways of doing things performs. Different compilers optimise certain things better, which gives the different preformances.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With