(I'm using Visual C++ 2008) I've always heard that main() is required to return an integer, but here I didn't put in return 0;
and and it compiled with 0 errors and 0 warnings! In the debug window it says the program has exited with code 0. If this function is named anything other than main(), the compiler complains saying 'blah' must return a value. Sticking a return;
also causes the error to appear. But leaving it out completely, it compiles just fine.
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
cout << "Hey look I'm supposed to return an int but I'm not gonna!\n";
}
Could this be a bug in VC++?
int main() doesn't include any list. So gcc is complaining about an old-style (K&R) function definition...that would allow main() to take any number of arguments. That's not one of the standard-sanctioned forms.
Nope. You can't call it anyway. You only need forward declarations for functions called before they are defined. You need external declarations (which look exactly like forward declarations on purpose) for functions defined in other files.
The short answer, is because the C++ standard requires main() to return int . As you probably know, the return value from the main() function is used by the runtime library as the exit code for the process. Both Unix and Win32 support the concept of a (small) integer returned from a process after it has finished.
Because the main function returns type integer,i.e either '1/program ran successfully' or '0/program compile error '.
3.6.1 Main function
....
2 An implementation shall not predefine the
main
function. This function shall not be overloaded. It shall have a return type of typeint
, but otherwise its type is implementation-defined. All implementations shall allow both of the following definitions of main:int main() { /* ... */ }
and
int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { /* ... */ }
.... and it continues to add ...
5 A
return
statement inmain
has the effect of leaving the main function (destroying any objects with automatic storage duration) and callingexit
with the return value as the argument. If control reaches the end ofmain
without encountering a return statement, the effect is that of executing return 0;
attempting to find an online copy of the C++ standard so I could quote this passage I found a blog post that quotes all the right bits better than I could.
This is part of the C++ language standard. An implicit return 0 is generated for you if there's no explicit return statement in main.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With