I have declared the following enum type in which I want the first member to have the ordinal value of 1 (one) rather than the usual 0 (zero):
type
TMyEnum = (
meFirstValue = 1,
meSecondValue,
meThirdValue
);
If I call TypeInfo(), e.g. as part of a call to GetEnumName(), I get a compiler error:
GetEnumName(TypeInfo(TMyEnum), Ord(aValue));
ERROR: "E2134: Type 'TMyEnum' has no typeinfo"
Why is this?
I know that classes only have typeinfo if they are compiled with the $M compiler option enabled or (derive from some class which was, such as TPersistent) but I didn't think there were any special conditions for having typeinfo for enum types.
Discontiguous enumerations, and enumerations which don't start at zero, don't have typeinfo. For typeinfo to be implemented, it would need to be in a different format from the existing tkEnumeration
, owing to backward compatibility issues.
I considered implementing a tkDiscontiguousEnumeration
(or possibly better named member) for Delphi 2010, but the benefit seemed small considering their relative scarcity and the difficulties in enumeration - how do you encode the ranges efficiently? Some encodings are better for some scenarios, worse for others.
Type information is not supported for enums where specific ordinal values are assigned that result in enum members having ordinal values that are different to those that would normally be assigned by the compiler.
If specific values are essential or desirable, "unused" enum members will have to be inserted to "pad" the enum as required. e.g (additional indentation for emphasis only):
type
TMyEnum = (
meNOTUSED1, {= 0}
meFirstValue, {= 1}
meSecondValue,
meThirdValue
);
A subrange can then be used to "filter" out the unused initial value:
TValidMyEnum = meFirstValue..meThirdValue;
Although you might then wish to consider renaming the original enum type so that your subrange type may be used throughout your project.
A subrange isn't sufficient if the enum contains "gaps":
type
TMyEnum = (
meNOTUSED1, {= 0}
meFirstValue, {= 1}
meSecondValue,
meThirdValue,
meNOTUSED2,
meFinalValue {= 5}
);
In this case there is no simply way to extend compile-time range checking to exclude the unused members, but a couple of set types will simplify the business of implementing any necessary runtime checks:
type
TMyEnums = set of TMyEnum;
const
meNOTUSED = [meUNUSED1, meUNUSED2]; // .. etc as required
meValidValues = [Low(TMyEnum)..High(TMyEnum)] - meNOTUSED;
if NOT (aValue in meValidValues) then
// etc
When you want to convert enums into specific values (and back) I useally create an array const, with the desired values per enum value:
Const MyEnumValues: array[TMyEnum] of integer = (1,2,5);
This way when the enum gets expanded you get an compiler error stating you are missing an array value.
Please note when changing the order of the enums, you must change the values accordingly.
To get the ‘value’ for an enum values just write:
Value := MyEnumValues[myenum];
And to get the enum value based on the ‘value’ just loop though the values of MyEnumValues:
Function GetEnumByValue(value:integer): TMyEnum;
Var
myenum: TMyEnum;
Begin
For myenum = low(TMyEnum) to high(TMyEnum) do
If MyEnumValues[myenum] = value then
exit(myenum);
Raise exception.create(‘invalid value for tmyenum’);
End;
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With