I'm currently going through Sandy Maguire's Thinking with Types, and chapter 2 covers Terms, Types and Kinds. In it, there's an example of a simple interaction with the type-level primitives for performing arithmetic on Nat
s.
The following session is shown to work in the book, but fails on my machine:
Prelude> import GHC.TypeLits
Prelude GHC.TypeLits> :set -XDataKinds
Prelude GHC.TypeLits> :set -XTypeOperators
Prelude GHC.TypeLits> :kind! (1 + 17) * 3
<interactive>:1:1: error:
* Expected kind `* -> Nat -> k0', but `1 + 17' has kind `Nat'
* In the type `(1 + 17) * 3'
The next example in the book works, though:
Prelude GHC.TypeLits> :kind! (128 `Div` 8) ^ 2
(128 `Div` 8) ^ 2 :: Nat
= 256
I suspect the problem has something to do with *
also indicates a kind. Sandy Maguire writes that this syntax is slated for deprecation, but if it's still around, I can see how GHCi thinks I mean the kind *
instead of the type-level function *
.
Am I on the right track, and if so, is there some flag I can use to make the example work?
I suspect the problem has something to do with * also indicates a kind.
Yes, that's the problem. It can be solved by using the -XNoStarIsType
extension, that lets you treat *
as just another type operator.
To refer to the kind formerly known as *
you can import Type
form Data.Kind
. For example, the kind of Maybe
is Type -> Type
and the kind of StateT
is Type -> (Type -> Type) -> Type -> Type
.
Hopefully, at some point in the future -XNoStarIsType
will become the default and we'll always use Type
.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With