Should you use .htm or .html file extension? What is the difference, and which file is correct? [closed]

Question

The short answer

There is none. They are exactly the same.

The long answer

Both .htm and .html are exactly the same and will work in the same way. The choice is down to personal preference, provided you’re consistent with your file naming you won’t have a problem with either.

Depending on the configuration of the web server, one of the file types will take precedence over the other. This should not be an issue since it’s unlikely that you’ll have both index.htm and index.html sitting in the same folder.

We always use the shorter .htm for our file names since file extensions are typically 3 characters long.

AND MORE ON: http://www.sightspecific.com/~mosh/WWW_FAQ/ext.html or http://www.sightspecific.com/~mosh/WWW_FAQ/ext.htm

I think I should add this part here:
There is one single slight difference between .htm and .html files. Consider a path in your server like: mydomain.com/myfolder. If you create an index.htm file inside that folder and you open that like this:mydomain.com/myfolder/, it will goes crazy and spit out your files as it is in your server,
but if you create an index.html file in there and open that directory in your browser, it will load that file. I tested this on my VPS and found this Maybe you could somehow set your server to load index.htm files by default, but I guess the .html file is the default file type for browsers to open in each directory.

Neither!

If you're asking; "what would a website visitor rather type, htm or html" - it's much better to give them a nice descriptive URL with no extension. If they get used to going to yoursite/contact.html and you change it to yoursite/contact.php you've broken that link. If you use yoursite/contact/ then there's no problem when you switch technology.

.html always for new files. .htm is a throwback to dos days.

.html - DOS has been dead for a long time. But it doesn't really make much difference in the end.