The article tag is used for wrapping an autonomous content on a page. A content is autonomous if it can be removed from the page and put on some another page. The section tag is similar to the div tag, but it is more meaningful since it wraps logical groups of related content (e.g. a chapter of an article).
The <section> tag defines a section in a document. The <article> tag specifies independent, self-contained content.
<section> means that the content inside is grouped (i.e. relates to a single theme), and should appear as an entry in an outline of the page. <div> , on the other hand, does not convey any meaning, aside from any found in its class , lang and title attributes.
Both the tags (<div> and <section>) are used in the webpage, <section> tag means that the content inside relates to a single theme, and <div> tag is used as a block part of the webpage and don't convey any particular meaning. HTML <div> Tag: It is called a division tag.
In the W3 wiki page about structuring HTML5, it says:
<section>
: Used to either group different articles into different purposes or subjects, or to define the different sections of a single article.
And then displays an image that I cleaned up:
It also describes how to use the <article>
tag (from same W3 link above):
<article>
is related to<section>
, but is distinctly different. Whereas<section>
is for grouping distinct sections of content or functionality,<article>
is for containing related individual standalone pieces of content, such as individual blog posts, videos, images or news items. Think of it this way - if you have a number of items of content, each of which would be suitable for reading on their own, and would make sense to syndicate as separate items in an RSS feed, then<article>
is suitable for marking them up.In our example,
<section id="main">
contains blog entries. Each blog entry would be suitable for syndicating as an item in an RSS feed, and would make sense when read on its own, out of context, therefore<article>
is perfect for them:
<section id="main">
<article>
<!-- first blog post -->
</article>
<article>
<!-- second blog post -->
</article>
<article>
<!-- third blog post -->
</article>
</section>
Simple huh? Be aware though that you can also nest sections inside articles, where it makes sense to do so. For example, if each one of these blog posts has a consistent structure of distinct sections, then you could put sections inside your articles as well. It could look something like this:
<article>
<section id="introduction">
</section>
<section id="content">
</section>
<section id="summary">
</section>
</article>
Sounds like you should wrap each of the "sections" (as you call them) in <article>
tags and entries in the article in <section>
tags.
The HTML5 spec says (Section):
The section element represents a generic section of a document or application. A section, in this context, is a thematic grouping of content, typically with a heading. [...]
Examples of sections would be chapters, the various tabbed pages in a tabbed dialog box, or the numbered sections of a thesis. A Web site's home page could be split into sections for an introduction, news items, and contact information.
Note: Authors are encouraged to use the article element instead of the section element when it would make sense to syndicate the contents of the element.
And for Article
The article element represents a self-contained composition in a document, page, application, or site and that is, in principle, independently distributable or reusable, e.g. in syndication. This could be a forum post, a magazine or newspaper article, a blog entry, a user-submitted comment, an interactive widget or gadget, or any other independent item of content.
I think what you call "sections" in the OP fit the definition of article as I can see them being independently distributable or reusable.
Update: Some minor text changes for article
in the latest editors draft for HTML 5.1 (changes in italic):
The article element represents a complete, or self-contained, composition in a document, page, application, or site and that is, in principle, independently distributable or reusable, e.g. in syndication. This could be a forum post, a magazine or newspaper article, a blog entry, a user-submitted comment, an interactive widget or gadget, or any other independent item of content.
Also, discussion on the Public HTML mailing list about article
in January and February of 2013.
I'd use <article>
for a text block that is totally unrelated to the other blocks on the page.
<section>
, on the other hand, would be a divider to separate a document which have are related to each other.
Now, i'm not sure what you have in your videos, newsfeed etc, but here's an example (there's no REAL right or wrong, just a guideline of how I use these tags):
<article>
<h1>People</h1>
<p>text about people</p>
<section>
<h1>fat people</h1>
<p>text about fat people</p>
</section>
<section>
<h1>skinny people</p>
<p>text about skinny people</p>
</section>
</article>
<article>
<h1>Cars</h1>
<p>text about cars</p>
<section>
<h1>Fast Cars</h1>
<p>text about fast cars</p>
</section>
</article>
As you can see, the sections are still relevant to each other, but as long as they're inside a block that groups them. Sections DONT have to be inside articles. They can be in the body of a document, but i use sections in the body, when the whole document is one article.
e.g.
<body>
<h1>Cars</h1>
<p>text about cars</p>
<section>
<h1>Fast Cars</h1>
<p>text about fast cars</p>
</section>
</body>
Hope this makes sense.
I like to stick with the standard meaning of the words used: An article
would apply to, well, articles. I would define blog posts, documents, and news articles as articles
. Sections on the other hand, would refer to layout/ux items: sidebar, header, footer would be sections. However this is all my own personal interpretation -- as you pointed out, the specification for these elements are not well defined.
Supporting this, the w3c defines an article
element as a section of content that can independently stand on its own. A blog post could stand on it's own as a valuable and consumable item of content. However, a header would not.
Here is an interesting article about one mans madness in trying to differenciate between the two new elements. The basic point of the article, that I also feel is correct, is to try and use what ever element you feel best actually represents what it contains.
What’s more problematic is that article and section are so very similar. All that separates them is the word “self-contained”. Deciding which element to use would be easy if there were some hard and fast rules. Instead, it’s a matter of interpretation. You can have multiple articles within a section, you can have multiple sections within and article, you can nest sections within sections and articles within sections. It’s up to you to decide which element is the most semantically appropriate in any given situation.
Here is a very good answer to the same question here on SO
The flowchart below can be of help when choosing one of the various semantic HTML5 elements:
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With