I'm confused about how to pass function argument into dplyr and ggplot codes. I'm using the newest version of dplyr and ggplot2 Here is my code to produce a barplot (clarity vs mean price)
diamond.plot<- function (data, group, metric) {
group<- quo(group)
metric<- quo(metric)
data() %>% group_by(!! group) %>%
summarise(price=mean(!! metric)) %>%
ggplot(aes(x=!! group,y=price))+
geom_bar(stat='identity')
}
diamond.plot(diamonds, group='clarity', metric='price')
error:
Error in UseMethod("group_by_") : no applicable method for 'group_by_' applied to an object of class "packageIQR"
For the newest version of dplyr, the underscored verbs_() is softly deprecated. It seems like we should use quosures.
my questions:
what was wrong with the above code? (no underscore dplyr verbs please..)
In ggplot, I know we can use aes_string(), but in my case, only one of the parameter in the aes is passed from function argument.
Thanks in advance.
Tidy evaluation is now fully supported in ggplot2 v3.0.0
so it's not necessary to use aes_
or aes_string
anymore.
library(rlang)
library(tidyverse)
diamond_plot <- function (data, group, metric) {
quo_group <- sym(group)
quo_metric <- sym(metric)
data %>%
group_by(!! quo_group) %>%
summarise(price = mean(!! quo_metric)) %>%
ggplot(aes(x = !! quo_group, y = !! quo_metric)) +
geom_col()
}
diamond_plot(diamonds, "clarity", "price")
Created on 2018-04-16 by the reprex package (v0.2.0).
I don't think you can that the "correct" way quite yet, as ggplot2 doesn't support the tidyeval syntax, but it's coming.
The best practice with the dplyr part of the code would be:
library(tidyverse)
library(rlang)
diamond_data <- function (data, group, metric) {
quo_group <- enquo(group)
quo_metric <- enquo(metric)
data %>%
group_by(!!quo_group) %>%
summarise(price=mean(!!quo_metric))
}
diamond_data(diamonds, clarity, price)
To work around the lack of support of the tidyeval in ggplot2, you could do (note the quotes around the variables in the function call):
diamond_plot <- function (data, group, metric) {
quo_group <- parse_quosure(group)
quo_metric <- parse_quosure(metric)
data %>%
group_by(!!quo_group) %>%
summarise(price=mean(!!quo_metric)) %>%
ggplot(aes_(x = as.name(group), y=as.name(metric)))+
geom_bar(stat='identity')
}
diamond_plot(diamonds, "clarity", "price")
EDIT -- Following @lionel's comment:
diamond_plot <- function (data, group, metric) {
quo_group <- sym(group)
quo_metric <- sym(metric)
data %>%
group_by(!!quo_group) %>%
summarise(price=mean(!!quo_metric)) %>%
ggplot(aes_(x = quo_group, y= quo_metric)) +
geom_bar(stat='identity')
}
diamond_plot(diamonds, "clarity", "price")
The most "tidyeval" way to this problem to me looks as combination of quo_name
and aes_string
functions. Avoid using trailing underscore verbs like aes_
since they're getting deprecated.
diamond_plot <- function(data, group, metric) {
quo_group <- enquo(group)
str_group <- quo_name(quo_group)
quo_metric <- enquo(metric)
summary <- data %>%
groupby(!!quo_group) %>%
summarise(mean = mean(!!quo_metric))
ggplot(summary) +
geom_bar(aes_string(x = str_group, y = "mean"), stat = "identity")
}
diamond_plot(diamnonds, clarity, price)
sinQueso's answer is promising but it misses the purpose of a function, which is to be adaptable to different data frames. The "price" variable is encoded in the function in the following line:
summarise(price=mean(!!quo_metric)) %>%
so this function will only work if the input variable is "price".
Here is a better solution that can be used for any data frame:
diamond_plot <- function (data, group, metric) {
quo_group <- sym(group)
quo_metric <- sym(metric)
summary <- data %>%
group_by(!!quo_group) %>%
summarise(mean=mean(!!quo_metric))
ggplot(summary, aes_string(x = group, y= "mean")) +
geom_bar(stat='identity')
}
diamond_plot(diamonds, "clarity", "price")
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With