If your projects are independent, it's fine to keep them in separate repositories. If they share components, then put them together. Very good reasoning, this should be the top answer in my opinion.
While most people will tell you to just use multiple repositories, I feel it's worth mentioning there are other solutions.
A single repository can contain multiple independent branches, called orphan branches. Orphan branches are completely separate from each other; they do not share histories.
git checkout --orphan BRANCHNAME
This creates a new branch, unrelated to your current branch. Each project should be in its own orphaned branch.
Now for whatever reason, git needs a bit of cleanup after an orphan checkout.
rm .git/index
rm -r *
Make sure everything is committed before deleting
Once the orphan branch is clean, you can use it normally.
Avoid all the hassle of orphan branches. Create two independent repositories, and push them to the same remote. Just use different branch names for each repo.
# repo 1
git push origin master:master-1
# repo 2
git push origin master:master-2
This is for using a single directory for multiple projects. I use this technique for some closely related projects where I often need to pull changes from one project into another. It's similar to the orphaned branches idea but the branches don't need to be orphaned. Simply start all the projects from the same empty directory state.
Don't expect wonders from this solution. As I see it, you are always going to have annoyances with untracked files. Git doesn't really have a clue what to do with them and so if there are intermediate files generated by a compiler and ignored by your .gitignore file, it is likely that they will be left hanging some of the time if you try rapidly swapping between - for example - your software project and a PH.D thesis project.
However here is the plan. Start as you ought to start any git projects, by committing the empty repository, and then start all your projects from the same empty directory state. That way you are certain that the two lots of files are fairly independent. Also, give your branches a proper name and don't lazily just use "master". Your projects need to be separate so give them appropriate names.
Git commits (and hence tags and branches) basically store the state of a directory and its subdirectories and Git has no idea whether these are parts of the same or different projects so really there is no problem for git storing different projects in the same repository. The problem is then for you clearing up the untracked files from one project when using another, or separating the projects later.
cd some_empty_directory
git init
touch .gitignore
git add .gitignore
git commit -m empty
git tag EMPTY
Start your projects from empty.
git branch software EMPTY
git checkout software
echo "array board[8,8] of piece" > chess.prog
git add chess.prog
git commit -m "chess program"
whenever you like.
git branch thesis EMPTY
git checkout thesis
echo "the meaning of meaning" > philosophy_doctorate.txt
git add philosophy_doctorate.txt
git commit -m "Ph.D"
Go back and forwards between projects whenever you like. This example goes back to the chess software project.
git checkout software
echo "while not end_of_game do make_move()" >> chess.prog
git add chess.prog
git commit -m "improved chess program"
You will however be annoyed by untracked files when swapping between projects/branches.
touch untracked_software_file.prog
git checkout thesis
ls
philosophy_doctorate.txt untracked_software_file.prog
Sort of by definition, git doesn't really know what to do with untracked files and it's up to you to deal with them. You can stop untracked files from being carried around from one branch to another as follows.
git checkout EMPTY
ls
untracked_software_file.prog
rm -r *
(directory is now really empty, apart from the repository stuff!)
git checkout thesis
ls
philosophy_doctorate.txt
By ensuring that the directory was empty before checking out our new project we made sure there were no hanging untracked files from another project.
$ GIT_AUTHOR_DATE='2001-01-01:T01:01:01' GIT_COMMITTER_DATE='2001-01-01T01:01:01' git commit -m empty
If the same dates are specified whenever committing an empty repository, then independently created empty repository commits can have the same SHA1 code. This allows two repositories to be created independently and then merged together into a single tree with a common root in one repository later.
# Create thesis repository.
# Merge existing chess repository branch into it
mkdir single_repo_for_thesis_and_chess
cd single_repo_for_thesis_and_chess
git init
touch .gitignore
git add .gitignore
GIT_AUTHOR_DATE='2001-01-01:T01:01:01' GIT_COMMITTER_DATE='2001-01-01:T01:01:01' git commit -m empty
git tag EMPTY
echo "the meaning of meaning" > thesis.txt
git add thesis.txt
git commit -m "Wrote my PH.D"
git branch -m master thesis
# It's as simple as this ...
git remote add chess ../chessrepository/.git
git fetch chess chess:chess
It may also help if you keep your projects in subdirectories where possible, e.g. instead of having files
chess.prog
philosophy_doctorate.txt
have
chess/chess.prog
thesis/philosophy_doctorate.txt
In this case your untracked software file will be chess/untracked_software_file.prog
. When working in the thesis
directory you should not be disturbed by untracked chess program files, and you may find occasions when you can work happily without deleting untracked files from other projects.
Also, if you want to remove untracked files from other projects, it will be quicker (and less prone to error) to dump an unwanted directory than to remove unwanted files by selecting each of them.
So you might want to name your branches something like
project1/master
project1/featureABC
project2/master
project2/featureXYZ
I would use git submodules
.
have a look here Git repository in a Git repository
As per February2019, I would suggest Monorepos
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With