I have a dataframe with text columns. I separated them into x_train
and x_test
.
My question is if its better to do Keras's Tokenizer.fit_on_text()
on the entire x
data set or just x_train
?
Like this:
tokenizer = Tokenizer()
tokenizer.fit_on_texts(x_data)
or
tokenizer.fit_on_texts(x_train) # <- fixed typo
tokenizer.texts_to_sequences(x_train)
Does it matter? I'd also have to tokenize x_test
later too, so can I just use the same tokenizer?
By default, all punctuation is removed, turning the texts into space-separated sequences of words (words maybe include the ' character). These sequences are then split into lists of tokens.
Keras Tokenizer Class The Tokenizer class of Keras is used for vectorizing a text corpus. For this either, each text input is converted into integer sequence or a vector that has a coefficient for each token in the form of binary values.
Although the information in this question is good, indeed, there are more important things that you need to notice:
You MUST use the same tokenizer in training and test data
Otherwise, there will be different tokens for each dataset. Each tokenizer has an internal dictionary that is created with fit_on_texts
.
It's not guaranteed that train and test data will have the same words with same frequencies, so each dataset will create a different dictionary, and all results from test data will be wrong.
This also means that you cannot fit_on_texts
, train and then fit_on_texts
again: this will change the internal dictionary.
It's possible to fit on the entire data. But it's probably a better idea to reserve a token for "unknown" words (oov_token=True
), for the cases when you find new test data with words your model has never seen (this requires that you replace rare words in training data with this token too).
As @Fernando H metioned, it is probably be better to fit the tokenizer only with train data (even though, you must reserve an oov token even in training data (the model must learn what to do with the oov).
The following test shows that the tokenizer completely ignores unknown words when oov_token
is not set. This might not be a good idea. Unknown words may be key words in sentences and simply ignoring them might be worse than knowing there is something unknown there.
import numpy as np
from keras.layers import *
from keras.models import Model
from keras.preprocessing.text import Tokenizer
training = ['hey you there', 'how are you', 'i am fine thanks', 'hello there']
test = ['he is fine', 'i am fine too']
tokenizer = Tokenizer()
tokenizer.fit_on_texts(training)
print(tokenizer.texts_to_sequences(training))
print(tokenizer.texts_to_sequences(test))
Outputs:
[[3, 1, 2], [4, 5, 1], [6, 7, 8, 9], [10, 2]]
[[8], [6, 7, 8]]
Now, this shows that the tokenizer will attibute index 1 to all unknown words:
tokenizer2 = Tokenizer(oov_token = True)
tokenizer2.fit_on_texts(training)
print(tokenizer2.texts_to_sequences(training))
print(tokenizer2.texts_to_sequences(test))
Outputs:
[[4, 2, 3], [5, 6, 2], [7, 8, 9, 10], [11, 3]]
[[1, 1, 9], [7, 8, 9, 1]]
But it might be interesting to have a group of rare words in training data replaced with 1 too, so your model has a notion of how to deal with unknown words.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With