IN vs ANY operator in PostgreSQL

Question

(Neither IN nor ANY is an "operator". A "construct" or "syntax element".)

Logically, quoting the manual:

IN is equivalent to = ANY.

But there are two syntax variants of IN and two variants of ANY. Details:

• How to use ANY instead of IN in a WHERE clause with Rails?

IN taking a set is equivalent to = ANY taking a set, as demonstrated here:

• postgreSQL - in vs any

But the second variant of each is not equivalent to the other. The second variant of the ANY construct takes an array (must be an actual array type), while the second variant of IN takes a comma-separated list of values. This leads to different restrictions in passing values and can also lead to different query plans in special cases:

• Index not used with =any() but used with in
• Pass multiple sets or arrays of values to a function
• How to match elements in an array of composite type?

ANY is more versatile

The ANY construct is far more versatile, as it can be combined with various operators, not just =. Example:

SELECT 'foo' LIKE ANY('{FOO,bar,%oo%}');

For a big number of values, providing a set scales better for each:

• Optimizing a Postgres query with a large IN

Related:

• Can PostgreSQL index array columns?

Inversion / opposite / exclusion

"Find rows where id is in the given array":

SELECT * FROM tbl WHERE id = ANY (ARRAY[1, 2]);

Inversion: "Find rows where id is not in the array":

SELECT * FROM tbl WHERE id <> ALL (ARRAY[1, 2]);
SELECT * FROM tbl WHERE id <> ALL ('{1, 2}');  -- equivalent array literal
SELECT * FROM tbl WHERE NOT (id = ANY ('{1, 2}'));

All three equivalent. The first with array constructor, the other two with array literal. The data type can be derived from context unambiguously. Else, an explicit cast may be required, like '{1,2}'::int[].

Rows with id IS NULL do not pass either of these expressions. To include NULL values additionally:

SELECT * FROM tbl WHERE (id = ANY ('{1, 2}')) IS NOT TRUE;

There are two obvious points, as well as the points in the other answer:

• They are exactly equivalent when using sub queries:

  SELECT * FROM table
  WHERE column IN(subquery);
  
  SELECT * FROM table
  WHERE column = ANY(subquery);
  

On the other hand:

• Only the IN operator allows a simple list:

  SELECT * FROM table
  WHERE column IN(… , … , …);
  

Presuming they are exactly the same has caught me out several times when forgetting that ANY doesn’t work with lists.