Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

How to write a Haskell function that takes a variadic function as an argument

I'm trying to create a function that gets a variadic function as an argument, i.e.

func :: (a -> ... -> a) -> a 

how can I accomplish this?

I've read about polyvariadic functions and I'm sure that Oleg already did it, however I'm lost trying to apply the pattern on a function with a variadic function as an argument. Especially Olegs approach seems to work with glasgow extensions only and I want the solution to work in pure Haskell 98 (like Text.Printf does).

The reason that I ask is that I'm trying to build a function which takes a boolean function as an argument and checks whether it is a tautology, i.e.

isTautology :: (Bool -> ... -> Bool) -> Bool 

so that one could type:

isTautology (\x -> x && not x) isTautology (\x y -> x && y || not y) 

My problem is that I keep reading about the trick was to make the return type a type variable (so that it can be the result or another function), but my return type is fixed (Bool).

like image 692
scravy Avatar asked Dec 02 '11 08:12

scravy


People also ask

Can variadic methods take any number of parameters?

A variadic function allows you to accept any arbitrary number of arguments in a function.

What symbols are used in a function declaration to indicate that it is a variadic function?

A function with a parameter that is preceded with a set of ellipses ( ... ) is considered a variadic function. The ellipsis means that the parameter provided can be zero, one, or more values. For the fmt. Println package, it is stating that the parameter a is variadic.

Is printf variadic function?

Variadic functions are functions (e.g. printf) which take a variable number of arguments.


1 Answers

The trick is to make a type class for which you will define an instance for functions, and an instance for the return type. The fact that it's a Bool is not a problem at all.

We're trying to write a function which takes a variadic argument and returns a Bool, so we'll define a type class with such a function.

class Stmt a where     tautology :: a -> Bool 

Next, we define an instance for the return type of the variadic function. In this case, that's Bool.

-- A Bool is a tautology if it's True. instance Stmt Bool where     tautology = id 

The key part is the next instance for functions that take a Bool argument, and whose return type is some type from our class. That way, this instance will be applied multiple times if a function takes multiple arguments.

-- A function is a tautology if it always returns a tautology. instance Stmt b => Stmt (Bool -> b) where     tautology f = tautology (f True) && tautology (f False) 

Writing it this way requires FlexibleInstances because of the Bool in the second instance head. To do the same with pure Haskell 98, we'll need to use a suitably-constrained type variable instead. We can for example use Bounded and Enum (there are instances for both for Bool), or you can make your own class that will let you construct the appropriate inputs.

instance (Enum a, Bounded a, Stmt b) => Stmt (a -> b) where     tautology f = all (tautology . f) [minBound .. maxBound] 

And we're done. Let's try it out:

> tautology $ \x y -> (not x && not y) == not (x && y) False > tautology $ \x y -> (not x && not y) == not (x || y) True 
like image 99
hammar Avatar answered Sep 22 '22 04:09

hammar