I have have the following parser to parse arithmetic expressions containing Float and RDD :
import scalaz._
import Scalaz._
def term2: Parser[List[\/[Float, RDD[(Int,Array[Float])]]]] = rep(factor2)
def factor2: Parser[\/[Float, RDD[(Int,Array[Float])]]] = pathxml | num
def pathxml: Parser[ RDD[(Int,Array[Float])]] = pathIdent ^^ { s => pathToRDD(s)} //pathToRDD is a function that gets the path in string and create an RDD from the file inside that path and pathIdent parse to see whether the input string is a path or not
def num: Parser[\/[Float, RDD[(Int,Array[Float])]]] = floatingPointNumber ^^ (n => n.left[RDD[(Int,Array[Float])]].toFloat)
Getting the following error:
[error] type mismatch;
[error] found : ParseExp.this.Parser[Serializable]
[error] required: ParseExp.this.Parser[scalaz.\/[Float,org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD[(Int, Array[Float])]]]
[error] def factor2: Parser[\/[Float, RDD[(Int,Array[Float])]]] = pathxml | num
[error] ^
I am new in Scala and don/t know how I can solve this error
Serializable
(or similarly Product
, or both together) is almost always an indication that you're trying to treat two types as the same when they're not. For example:
scala> if (true) "a" else List(1)
res0: java.io.Serializable = a
The type of a conditional expression is the least upper bound of the types of its two branches—i.e. the most specific type the branches have in common. Here we have a String
and a List[Int]
, which are both instances of AnyRef
, but otherwise don't have anything in common besides being Serializable
. The fact that they're both Serializable
is more specific than the fact that they're both subtypes of AnyRef
, so that's the inferred type.
The type of a sequence is inferred similarly:
scala> List("a", "b", "c", 'd)
res1: List[java.io.Serializable] = List(a, b, c, 'd)
In general any time you see Serializable
, you should start hunting for something whose type isn't the same as its neighbors or siblings.
In your case pathxml | num
is going to be the least upper bound of Parser[RDDThing]
and Parser[Float \/ RDDThing]
, which is again Parser[Serializable]
. You should be able to fix this by lifting pathxml
into the larger type in your factor2
definition with pathxml.map(_.right) | num
.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With