If I wanted to pipe into a case, I would do the following:
amount
|> calculate
|> case do
1 -> "one"
2 -> "two"
_ -> "many"
end
Would it be possible to pipe into a for
loop in a similar way, something like:
amounts
|> calculate
|> for do
IO.inspect &1
end
or
amounts
|> calculate
|> Kernel.for(&IO.inspect/1)
I am aware that I could use the Enum
methods, but I am more curious about how the above could work.
Unfortunately, this isn't possible. The reason it works with case
is that case
is a macro whose first argument is a value and the second is the match clauses. for
on the other hand has only one argument which includes all clauses and the do block:
iex(1)> quote do
...(1)> for a <- 1..10, b <- 1..10, do: a + b
...(1)> end
{:for, [],
[
{:<-, [],
[{:a, [], Elixir}, {:.., [context: Elixir, import: Kernel], [1, 10]}]},
{:<-, [],
[{:b, [], Elixir}, {:.., [context: Elixir, import: Kernel], [1, 10]}]},
[
do: {:+, [context: Elixir, import: Kernel],
[{:a, [], Elixir}, {:b, [], Elixir}]}
]
]}
(As you can see, for
takes onea argument which is the whole value a <- 1..10, b <- 1..10, do: a + b
.)
The best you can do with for
is to pipe into an anonymous function. It isn't pretty but I have used this a couple of times when I wanted the functionality of for
that isn't supported by Enum.each
or Enum.map
(multiple clauses, inline filters, into
, etc).
iex(2)> 1..5 |> (fn x -> for(i <- x, do: IO.puts(i)) end).()
1
2
3
4
5
[:ok, :ok, :ok, :ok, :ok]
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With