I come across some MC++ code like this:
__gc class ClassA
{
Puclic:
ClassB GetClassB();
}
__gc class ClassB
{
Public:
int Value;
}
int main()
{
ClassA^ a = gcnew ClassA();
ClassB^ b = a->GetClassB();
int c = b->Value;
}
Isn't it important to check whether b is NULL before access to its value? I tried if(b == NULL)
, but it dosen't work.
Or it's really not necessary to do the check? however I can hardly believe it...
PS: I only want to know whether the "Reference" itself could be NULL here. Whether the content of class B is null isn't important.
This program is both syntactically and semantically correct, as far as I can tell.
The reference COULD be null there, depending on the implementation of GetClassB()
. So, technically, there could be a null-reference waiting to happen there.
However, if the contents of GetClassB()
looks like this:
return gcnew ClassB();
you are guaranteed to either throw an exception or succeed, which means that the reference would never accidentally be null.
So, the real answer is: It depends, but you are never required to check for null.
To check for null use:
if (b == nullptr)
{
}
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With