I have a custom attribute class derived from AuthorizationAttribute, which performs custom security on controller actions. The OnAuthorizationCore method depends on various other components (e.g. DAL) in order to ajudicate whether a user can invoke an action.
I'm using Autofac for dependency injection. The ExtensibleActionInvoker claims to be able to perform property injection on action filters. Setting an attribute's properties at runtime (which seems like a bad idea) will work in a simple unit test, but in a busy, multi-threaded web server it's bound to go wrong, and so this idea seems like an anti-pattern. Hence this question:
If my AuthorizationAttribute depends on other components in order to work correctly, what it the right [architecture] pattern in order to achieve this?
i.e. AuthorizationAttribute depends on IUserRepository... how should this relationship be resolved?
Resolve dependencies using IServiceProvider You can use the IServiceCollection interface to create a dependency injection container. Once the container has been created, the IServiceCollection instance is composed into an IServiceProvider instance. You can use this instance to resolve services.
ASP.NET MVC 5 has arrived with a very important feature called Filter Overrides. Using the Filter Overrides feature, we can exclude a specific action method or controller from the global filter or controller level filter. ASP.NET MVC 5 has arrived with a very important feature called Filter Overrides.
A dependency resolver is just a service locator integrated with the ASP.NET MVC codebase. Resolvers are a way to add the implementation of the Dependency Inversion principle into an existing (large) codebase.
Action Filter is an attribute that you can apply to a controller action or an entire controller. This filter will be called before and after the action starts executing and after the action has executed. Action filters implement the IActionFilter interface that has two methods OnActionExecuting andOnActionExecuted.
The ExtensibleActionInvoker claims to be able to perform property injection on action filters.
Correct - but don't confuse action filters with the attributes that might not implement them. The cleanest way to approach this in ASP.NET MVC is to split responsibilities, even though the MVC framework allows you to combine them.
E.g., use a pair of classes - an attribute class that holds data only:
// Just a regular old attribute with data values
class SomeAttribute : Attribute { ... }
And a filter that has dependencies injected:
// Gets dependencies injected
class SomeFilter : IActionFilter { ... }
SomeFilter
just uses the typical approach of getting the SomeAttribute
attribute from the controller or action method via GetCustomAttributes()
to do whatever work is needed.
You can then use ExtensibleActionInvoker
to wire up the filter:
builder.RegisterControllers(...).InjectActionInvoker();
builder.RegisterType<ExtensibleActionInvoker>().As<IActionInvoker>();
builder.RegisterType<SomeFilter>().As<IActionFilter>();
It might be a little more code than you'd write using the attribute-as-filter approach, but the quality of the code will be better in the long run (e.g. by avoiding the limitations of attributes and the awkwardness of the Service Locator solutions.)
I would seem that the easiest way to achieve this is to bite the bullet and accept a dependency on autofac itself. While a dependency on the IoC is in itself an anti-pattern, it's somewhat more pallatable. You can implement a property as follows:
public class UserAuthorizeAttribute : AuthorizeAttribute
{
public IUserRepository CurrentUserService
{
get
{
var cpa = (IContainerProviderAccessor)HttpContext.Current.ApplicationInstance;
var cp = cpa.ContainerProvider;
return cp.RequestLifetime.Resolve<IUserRepository>();
}
}
}
...
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With