I am a bit confused by the following code:
#include <iostream> const char* f() { const char* arr[]={"test"}; return arr[0]; } int main() { auto x = f(); std::cout << x; }
In my opinion, this code should be UB (undefined behaviour). We return a pointer to a C-style array element inside a local scope. Things should go wrong. However, none of the compilers I tested with complain (I used -Wall -Wextra -pedantic
on both g++ and clang). valgrind
does not complain either.
Is the code above valid or is it UB as one would think?
PS: running it seems to produce the "correct" result, i.e. displaying "test", but that's not an indication of correctness.
No, it's not UB.
This:
const char* f() { const char* arr[]={"test"}; return arr[0]; }
Can be rewritten to the equivalent:
const char* f() { const char* arr0 = "test"; return arr0; }
So we're just returning a local pointer, to a string literal. String literals have static storage duration, nothing dangles. The function really is the same as:
const char* f() { return "test"; }
If you did something like this:
const char* f() { const char arr[] = "test"; // local array of char, not array of char const* return arr; }
Now that is UB - we're returning a dangling pointer.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With