Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Does WinRT still have the same old UI threading restrictions?

In WinForms, pretty much all your UI is thread-specific. You have to use [STAThread] so that the common dialogs will work, and you can't (safely) access a UI element from any thread other than the one that created it. From what I've heard, that's because that's just how Windows works -- window handles are thread-specific.

In WPF, these same restrictions were kept, because ultimately it's still building on top of the same Windows API, still window handles (though mostly just for top-level windows), etc. In fact, WPF even made things more restrictive, because you can't even access things like bitmaps across threads.

Now along comes WinRT, a whole new way of accessing Windows -- a fresh, clean slate. Are we still stuck with the same old threading restrictions (specifically: only being able to manipulate a UI control from the thread that created it), or have they opened this up?

like image 687
Joe White Avatar asked Sep 20 '11 17:09

Joe White


2 Answers

I would expect it to be the same model - but much easier to use, at least from C# and VB, with the new async handling which lets you write a synchronous-looking method which just uses "await" when it needs to wait for a long-running task to complete before proceeding.

Given the emphasis on making asynchronous code easier to write, it would be surprising for MS to forsake the efficiency of requiring single-threaded access to the UI at the same time.

like image 181
Jon Skeet Avatar answered Oct 13 '22 09:10

Jon Skeet


The threading model is identical. There is still a notion of single threaded and multi-threaded apartments (STA/MTA), it must be initialized by a call to RoInitialize. Which behaves very much like CoInitialize in name, argument and error returns. The user interface thread is single threaded, confirmed at 36:00 in this video.

like image 34
Hans Passant Avatar answered Oct 13 '22 09:10

Hans Passant