In C++, can member function pointers be used to point to derived (or even base) class members?
EDIT: Perhaps an example will help. Suppose we have a hierarchy of three classes X
, Y
, Z
in order of inheritance. Y
therefore has a base class X
and a derived class Z
.
Now we can define a member function pointer p
for class Y
. This is written as:
void (Y::*p)();
(For simplicity, I'll assume we're only interested in functions with the signature void f()
)
This pointer p
can now be used to point to member functions of class Y
.
This question (two questions, really) is then:
p
be used to point to a function in the derived class Z
?p
be used to point to a function in the base class X
?The pointer to member operators . * and ->* are used to bind a pointer to a member of a specific class object. Because the precedence of () (function call operator) is higher than . * and ->* , you must use parentheses to call the function pointed to by ptf .
The 'this' pointer is passed as a hidden argument to all nonstatic member function calls and is available as a local variable within the body of all nonstatic functions. 'this' pointer is not available in static member functions as static member functions can be called without any object (with class name).
In C, like normal data pointers (int *, char *, etc), we can have pointers to functions. Following is a simple example that shows declaration and function call using function pointer.
Function Pointers point to code like normal pointers. In Functions Pointers, function's name can be used to get function's address. A function can also be passed as an arguments and can be returned from a function.
C++03 std, §4.11 2 Pointer to member conversions:
An rvalue of type “pointer to member of B of type cv T,” where B is a class type, can be converted to an rvalue of type “pointer to member of D of type cv T,” where D is a derived class (clause 10) of B. If B is an inaccessible (clause 11), ambiguous (10.2) or virtual (10.1) base class of D, a program that necessitates this conversion is ill-formed. The result of the conversion refers to the same member as the pointer to member before the conversion took place, but it refers to the base class member as if it were a member of the derived class. The result refers to the member in D’s instance of B. Since the result has type “pointer to member of D of type cv T,” it can be dereferenced with a D object. The result is the same as if the pointer to member of B were dereferenced with the B sub-object of D. The null member pointer value is converted to the null member pointer value of the destination type. 52)
52)The rule for conversion of pointers to members (from pointer to member of base to pointer to member of derived) appears inverted compared to the rule for pointers to objects (from pointer to derived to pointer to base) (4.10, clause 10). This inversion is necessary to ensure type safety. Note that a pointer to member is not a pointer to object or a pointer to function and the rules for conversions of such pointers do not apply to pointers to members. In particular, a pointer to member cannot be converted to a void*.
In short, you can convert a pointer to a member of an accessible, non-virtual base class to a pointer to a member of a derived class as long as the member isn't ambiguous.
class A { public: void foo(); }; class B : public A {}; class C { public: void bar(); }; class D { public: void baz(); }; class E : public A, public B, private C, public virtual D { public: typedef void (E::*member)(); }; class F:public E { public: void bam(); }; ... int main() { E::member mbr; mbr = &A::foo; // invalid: ambiguous; E's A or B's A? mbr = &C::bar; // invalid: C is private mbr = &D::baz; // invalid: D is virtual mbr = &F::bam; // invalid: conversion isn't defined by the standard ...
Conversion in the other direction (via static_cast
) is governed by § 5.2.9 9:
An rvalue of type "pointer to member of D of type cv1 T" can be converted to an rvalue of type "pointer to member of B of type cv2 T", where B is a base class (clause 10 class.derived) of D, if a valid standard conversion from "pointer to member of B of type T" to "pointer to member of D of type T" exists (4.11 conv.mem), and cv2 is the same cv-qualification as, or greater cv-qualification than, cv1.11) The null member pointer value (4.11 conv.mem) is converted to the null member pointer value of the destination type. If class B contains the original member, or is a base or derived class of the class containing the original member, the resulting pointer to member points to the original member. Otherwise, the result of the cast is undefined. [Note: although class B need not contain the original member, the dynamic type of the object on which the pointer to member is dereferenced must contain the original member; see 5.5 expr.mptr.oper.]
11) Function types (including those used in pointer to member function types) are never cv-qualified; see 8.3.5 dcl.fct.
In short, you can convert from a derived D::*
to a base B::*
if you can convert from a B::*
to a D::*
, though you can only use the B::*
on objects that are of type D or are descended from D.
I'm not 100% sure what you are asking, but here is an example that works with virtual functions:
#include <iostream> using namespace std; class A { public: virtual void foo() { cout << "A::foo\n"; } }; class B : public A { public: virtual void foo() { cout << "B::foo\n"; } }; int main() { void (A::*bar)() = &A::foo; (A().*bar)(); (B().*bar)(); return 0; }
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With