According to http://hyperpolyglot.org/lisp, the only falsehoods in Clojure are false
and nil
. Indeed, surprisingly enough, (Boolean. false)
is not false:
user=> (if (Boolean. false) 1 2)
1
user=> (not (Boolean. false))
false
user=> (false? (Boolean. false))
false
On the other hand, it somehow is false:
user=> (class false)
java.lang.Boolean
user=> (= false (Boolean. false))
true
This is rather counterintuitive. Are there reasons for this behaviour or was it simply overlooked?
You can find the explanation at http://clojure.org/special_forms#if.
It's good to read the whole paragraph, but here's the crucial bit excerpted, emphasis added:
[...] All [...] conditionals in Clojure are based upon the same logic, that is, nil and false constitute logical falsity, and everything else constitutes logical truth, and those meanings apply throughout. [...] Note that if does not test for arbitrary values of java.lang.Boolean, only the singular value false (Java's Boolean.FALSE), so if you are creating your own boxed Booleans make sure to use Boolean/valueOf and not the Boolean constructors.
Compare
System.out.println(Boolean.valueOf(false) ? true : false); // false
System.out.println(new Boolean(false) ? true : false); // false
with
user=> (if (Boolean/valueOf false) true false)
false
user=> (if (Boolean. false) true false)
true
Thus, (Boolean. false)
is neither nil
nor false
, just as (Object.)
is neither nil
nor false
. And as @Chiron has pointed out, it's bad practice to use it anyway.
As for (= false (Boolean. false))
being true, I think @looby's explanation is spot on: Since =
relies on Java's equals
method, the special semantics of conditionals in Clojure don't apply, and boolean equality will be as it is in Java.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With