Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

autoconf using sh, I need SHELL=BASH, how do I force autoconf to use bash?

I'm running autoconf and configure sets SHELL to '/bin/sh'. This creates huge problems. How to force SHELL to be '/bin/bash' for autoconf?

I'm trying to get this running on osx, it's working on linux. Linux is using SHELL=/bin/bash. osx defaults to /bin/sh.

like image 573
FlinkmanSV Avatar asked Oct 02 '08 06:10

FlinkmanSV


People also ask

How do I set my shell to Bash?

Hold the Ctrl key, click your user account's name in the left pane, and select “Advanced Options.” Click the “Login Shell” dropdown box and select “/bin/bash” to use Bash as your default shell or “/bin/zsh” to use Zsh as your default shell. Click “OK” to save your changes.

How do I run a bash script manually?

In order to run a Bash script on your system, you have to use the “bash” command and specify the script name that you want to execute, with optional arguments. Alternatively, you can use “sh” if your distribution has the sh utility installed. As an example, let's say that you want to run a Bash script named “script”.

How do I use Bash shell?

Bash as a scripting language. To create a bash script, you place #!/bin/bash at the top of the file. To execute the script from the current directory, you can run ./scriptname and pass any parameters you wish. When the shell executes a script, it finds the #!/path/to/interpreter .

Is Bourne shell same as Bash?

How do Bourne shell and Bash differ? Bash is basically Bourne with more features; though, most of the commands work similarly, there are differences. Namely, interfaces and script compatibility. The first difference with Bourne is that it doesn't come with all of the conveniences of Bash.


3 Answers

I have similar problems on Solaris with GCC - and I use the 'standard' technique:

CONFIG_SHELL=/bin/bash ./configure ...

(Or, actually, I use /bin/ksh, but setting the CONFIG_SHELL env var allows you to tell autoconf scripts which shell to use.)

I checked the configure script for git and gd (they happened to be extracted) to check that this wasn't a GCC peculiar env var.

like image 85
Jonathan Leffler Avatar answered Oct 21 '22 05:10

Jonathan Leffler


What are the "huge problems"? autoconf works very hard to generate a configure script that works with a very large percentage of shells. If you have an example of a construct that autoconf is writing that is not portable, please report it to the autoconf mailing list. On the other hand, if the problems you are experiencing are a result of your own shell code in configure.ac not being portable (eg, you're using bashisms) then the solution is to either stop using non-portable code or require the user to explicitly set SHELL or CONFIG_SHELL at configure time.

It sounds like the problem you are experiencing is in the environment of the user running configure. On Linux, your user has SHELL set to /bin/bash, but on OS X it is set to /bin/sh. The configure script generated by autoconf does some initial tests of the shell it is running under and does attempt to re-exec itself using a different shell if the provided shell lacks certain features. However, if you are introducing non-portable shell code in configure.ac, then you are violating one of the main philosophy's of autoconf -- namely that configure scripts should be portable. If you truly want to use bashisms in your shell code, then you are requiring your user to pass SHELL=/bin/bash as an argument to the configure script. This is not a bug in autoconf, but would be considered by many to be a bug in your project's build.

like image 22
William Pursell Avatar answered Oct 21 '22 03:10

William Pursell


Autoconf is supposed to solve portability problems by generating a script which can run "anywhere". That's why it generates bizarre code like:

if test X$foo = X ; then ...   # check if foo is empty

rather than:

if [ "$x" = "" ] ; then ...

That kind of crufty code probably once allowed these scripts to run on some ancient Ultrix system or whatever.

An configure script not running because of shell differences is like coming to a Formula-1 race with 10 liters of gas, and three spare tires.

If you're developing a configure script with Autoconf, and it is sensitive to whether the shell is Bash or the OSX shell, you are doing something wrong, or the Autoconf people broke something. If it's from you, fix whatever shell pieces you are adding to the script by making them portable.

like image 36
Kaz Avatar answered Oct 21 '22 03:10

Kaz