I need to measure the time certain parts of my program take (not for debugging but as a feature in the output). Accuracy is important because the total time will be a fraction of a second.
I was going to use the time module when I came across timeit, which claims to avoid a number of common traps for measuring execution times. Unfortunately it has an awful interface, taking a string as input which it then eval's.
So, do I need to use this module to measure time accurately, or will time suffice? And what are the pitfalls it refers to?
Thanks
clock() has 1/100th of a second granularity and time. time() is much more precise. On either platform, the default timer functions measure wall clock time, not the CPU time. This means that other processes running on the same computer may interfere with the timing ...
time() The time() function returns the number of seconds passed since epoch. For Unix system, January 1, 1970, 00:00:00 at UTC is epoch (the point where time begins).
We should measure the performance of blocks of python code in a project by recording the execution time and by finding the amount of memory being used by the block. This will help us to know the size of the system required to run the application and also get an idea of the duration of the run.
1) Create a loop around whatneeds to be measured, that executes 10, 100, or 1000 times or more. Measure execution time to the nearest 10 msec. Then divide that time bythe number of times the loop executed. If the loop executed 1000 timesusing a 10 msec clock, you obtain a resolution of 10 µsec for theloop.
Python – Measure time taken by program to execute 1 Store the starting time before the first line of the program executes. 2 Store the ending time after the last line of the program executes. 3 Print the difference between start time and end time. More ...
The clock function in the time module of Python returns processing time as an output to the end-user. The main role of the function is to facilitate benchmarking and performance testing. The function provides the accurate or correct time taken by the Python code segment to complete its execution.
System time represents a computer system's notion of the passing of time. One should remember that the system clock could be modified by the operating system, thus modifying the system time. Python's time module provides various time-related functions.
Python's time module provides various time-related functions. Since most of the time functions call platform-specific C library functions with the same name, the semantics of these functions are platform-dependent.
According to the Python documentation, it has to do with the accuracy of the time function in different operating systems:
The default timer function is platform dependent. On Windows, time.clock() has microsecond granularity but time.time()‘s granularity is 1/60th of a second; on Unix, time.clock() has 1/100th of a second granularity and time.time() is much more precise. On either platform, the default timer functions measure wall clock time, not the CPU time. This means that other processes running on the same computer may interfere with the timing ... On Unix, you can use time.clock() to measure CPU time.
To pull directly from timeit.py
's code:
if sys.platform == "win32": # On Windows, the best timer is time.clock() default_timer = time.clock else: # On most other platforms the best timer is time.time() default_timer = time.time
In addition, it deals directly with setting up the runtime code for you. If you use time
you have to do it yourself. This, of course saves you time
Timeit's setup:
def inner(_it, _timer): #Your setup code %(setup)s _t0 = _timer() for _i in _it: #The code you want to time %(stmt)s _t1 = _timer() return _t1 - _t0
Since Python 3.3 you can use time.perf_counter()
(system-wide timing) or time.process_time()
(process-wide timing), just the way you used to use time.clock()
:
from time import process_time t = process_time() #do some stuff elapsed_time = process_time() - t
The new function process_time
will not include time elapsed during sleep.
Since Python 3.7 you can also use process_time_ns()
which is similar to process_time()
but returns time in nanoseconds.
You could build a timing context (see PEP 343) to measure blocks of code pretty easily.
from __future__ import with_statement import time class Timer(object): def __enter__(self): self.__start = time.time() def __exit__(self, type, value, traceback): # Error handling here self.__finish = time.time() def duration_in_seconds(self): return self.__finish - self.__start timer = Timer() with timer: # Whatever you want to measure goes here time.sleep(2) print timer.duration_in_seconds()
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With