We have two heads. One is our main development head and the other is one that I forgot about until today. We found a bug and fixed it in our main development branch, and I just realized it should be fixed in the older branch as well.
I think it would have been better to make the change on the older branch and merge that with the up-to-date branch, but we didn't do it that way. Can mercurial handle this? We haven't tried to do anything like this and I can't really wrap my head around how it would be done.
From the main menu, select Hg | Mercurial | Update to. In the Switch Working Directory dialog that opens, specify the target working directory: To switch to another line of development, choose Branch and select the desired branch from the list.
Named branches If no branch name was set, Mercurial assigns the branch name "default". So the name of the default branch in a repository is "default" (which, for example, is not displayed when doing a hg log). Mercurial branch names may be used for whatever reasons users want.
Yes, you have two good options:
This version introduced the graft command which can backport changes in an intelligent way. The "intelligence" is that it will use merges internally and this means that you get
Support for renames: Imagine that you fixed the bug in file foo.c
on the development branch. In the older maintenance branch foo.c
was called bar.c
. Using hg graft
, the change to foo.c
can be correctly merged into the old bar.c
.
Three-way merges: Grafting involves twisting the graph around and merging in that temporary graph. The advantage of three-way merges is that you can use your normal graphical merge tool to resolve conflicts.
To copy the tip of default
onto old-branch
you simply run
$ hg update old-branch
$ hg graft default
Before we had the graft command, the transplant extension was the way to go. This simple extension will export a changeset as a patch and try to apply the patch onto some other revision.
Because we're dealing with "dumb" patches things like renames will not be taken into account and you will not get support for your merge tool since there is no three-way merge. Despite of this, I've found that transplant works really well in practice.
Using transplant is simple:
$ hg update old-branch
$ hg transplant default
This is very close to running
$ hg update old-branch
$ hg export default | hg import -
except that transplant also adds a piece of meta data that records the original changeset in the transplanted changeset. This can be used to skip future transplants.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With