Menu
In recent trends I've seen people animating CSS sprites using JavaScript instead of using animated GIFs?
Ex:
Is that all just to show or experiment with technology or are there any benefits out of it. I m interested in knowing the benefits, if there. The reason I m asking is that I couldn't figure out as in both cases we need to generate the intermediate frames (mostly using tweening technique).
517
Yes, but each frame in the GIF must be a different costume.
Animation Duration Not Set By default, a CSS animation cycle is zero seconds long. To override this, add an animation-duration rule to your targeted element with a seconds value, in the same block as animation-name. Below, try removing the comments around animation-duration to fix the animation.
TL;DR # Use CSS animations for simpler "one-shot" transitions, like toggling UI element states. Use JavaScript animations when you want to have advanced effects like bouncing, stop, pause, rewind, or slow down.
Yes it is which if your gif is not so long would not be a huge problem. On top of that, making animation with sprite takes 5min. the simplest solution is to use 2DToolkit. even though Unity now has a 2D system, almost all big projects still use 2DToolkit as it is just so easy for certain things.
Control
You have no control over animated GIFs. You can't start them, you can't stop them. They just animate as soon as they load.
With sprites, you can control the animation. You can start, stop and react to browser events, pan through the animation. For example, Google Doodles usually activate when you click on them.
A nifty GIF control system can be found in the 9gag. You can start them by appending them to the DOM, and stop them by removing them and swapping them with a pre-generated "first-frame view". But that's as far as GIFs go.
Independent Instances
When you load multiple instances of the same GIF, all these instances use the same image across the page and move at the same time. If you have a row of dancing unicorns GIFs, they'd be dancing at the same time. Synchronized dancing!
But with sprites, even if you are using the same images, the animation relies on the underlying script. So if one sprite is animated by one script and another by another script, both animations can run independently, and differently from one another.
This saves you from creating another GIF and it's easy to modify since you are only changing the script.
Ensuring smooth animation
Animated GIFs just animate while loading, and when the internet is slow, the animations freeze up until more of the image gets loaded.
In contrast, the advantage of sprites is you can pre-load them, ensure all images load beforehand. This makes sure that the resources used for that animation are already loaded prior to animation to make sure it animates as smooth as possible.
However, GIFs are still images. You can dynamically load them off the DOM and listen for a load event before you append them to the DOM.
Partial rendering
With PNG sprites, you can do "partials" in the animation, breaking an animation scene to parts. For example, when a character stands still, but the arms are waving. You don't need to animate the entire character, or the entire scene. You can place an element depicting the sprite of the character's body in a "freeze" state while the arms are a different element that is animating. This conserves space and size of the sprite sheet. A good example for this was the 2012 Mother's Day Doodle by Google.
In contrast, most of the time, every frame in a GIF animation is whole image, and animates whether or not anything in it moves. The more frames, the bigger the size of the GIF.
GIFs just don't scale
GIFs were meant for icons. The ratio of file size to image size don't scale up that well in GIFs as compared with PNG and JPG.
54
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With
