I've recently read about [[nodiscard]]
in C++17, and as far as I understand it's a new feature (design by contract?) which forces you to use the return value. This makes sense for controversial functions like std::launder
(nodiscard since C++20), but I wonder why std::move
isn't defined like so in C++17/20. Do you know a good reason or is it because C++20 isn't finalised yet?
The [[nodiscard]] attribute can be used to indicate that the return value of a function shouldn't be ignored when you do a function call. If the return value is ignored, the compiler should give a warning on this.
Yes, using [[nodiscard]] is a good practice when discarding the result is likely a bug.
The MSVC standard library team went ahead and added several thousand instances of [[nodiscard]]
since VS 2017 15.6, and have reported wild success with it (both in terms of finding lots of bugs and generating no user complaints). The criteria they described were approximately:
vector::size()
, vector::empty
, and even std::count_if()
allocate()
std::remove()
MSVC does mark both std::move()
and std::forward()
as [[nodiscard]]
following these criteria.
While it's not officially annotated as such in the standard, it seems to provide clear user benefit and it's more a question of crafting such a paper to mark all the right things [[nodiscard]]
(again, several thousand instances from MSVC) and apply them -- it's not complex work per se, but the volume is large. In the meantime, maybe prod your favorite standard library vendor and ask them to [[nodiscard]]
lots of stuff?
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With