According to the JLS, runtime evaluation of an array access expression behaves as follows:
So this code will print: java.lang.NullPointerException, index=2
class Test3 { public static void main(String[] args) { int index = 1; try { nada()[index = 2]++; } catch (Exception e) { System.out.println(e + ", index=" + index); } } static int[] nada() { return null; } }
The question is: for what reason do we need to first evaluate the index = 2
expression and not just throw the NullPointerException once the array reference is evaluated to null? Or in other words - why is the order 1,2,3 and not 1,3,2?
An array access expression has two sub-expressions:
An array access expression contains two subexpressions, the array reference expression (before the left bracket) and the index expression (within the brackets).
The two sub-expressions are evaluated before the array access expression itself, in order to evaluate the expression.
After evaluating the two sub-expressions
nada()[index = 2]++;
becomes
null[2]++;
Only now the expression is evaluated and the NullPointerException
is thrown.
This is consistent with the evaluation of most expressions in Java (the only counter examples I can think of are short circuiting operators such as && and ||).
For example, if you make the following method call:
firstMethod().secondMethod(i = 2);
First you evaluate firstMethod()
and i = 2
, and only later you throw NullPointerException
if firstMethod()
evaluated to null
.
This is because in the generated bytecode there are no explicit null checks.
nada()[index = 2]++;
is translated into the following byte code:
// evaluate the array reference expression INVOKESTATIC Test3.nada ()[I // evaluate the index expression ICONST_2 DUP ISTORE 1 // access the array // if the array reference expression was null, the IALOAD operation will throw a null pointer exception DUP2 IALOAD ICONST_1 IADD IASTORE
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With