I would like to work with ordered enumerables, and use interfaces as return types rather than the concrete types. I need to return an ordered set of objects. But, when using an IList<T>
implementation I can not return IOrderedEnumerable<T>
, as IList<T>
does not inherit IOrderedEnumerable<T>
.
In the example below I have a view model with a repository of series, implemented as a List<T>
of series objects, which are, as they are residing in a List<T>
, ordered. I an accessor method, I want to return a filtered set of the series where only series objects of a specific type are returned, while keeping the original order among the filtered elements.
/// <summary>
/// Represents the view model for this module.
/// </summary>
public class ViewModel : AbstractViewModel
{
/// <summary>
/// Gets the series repository.
/// </summary>
/// <value>The series repository.</value>
public IList<ISeries> SeriesRepository { get; private set; }
//...
}
//8<-----------------------------
/// <summary>
/// Gets the series of the specified type.
/// </summary>
public IOrderedEnumerable<T> Series<T>() where T : ISeries
{
return ViewModel.SeriesRepository.OfType<T>(); //compiler ERROR
}
The compiler tells me:
Error 14 Cannot implicitly convert type 'System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable<T>' to 'System.Linq.IOrderedEnumerable<T>'. An explicit conversion exists (are you missing a cast?) ...
How can I support such a scenario? And why does List not implement IOrderedEnumerable?
EDIT: To clarify my intentions: I simply want to declare at the interface level, that my Repository has an order, even if it is not explicitly specified by a key.
Thus, .ThenBy
et.al. should not add a new order, as there is already one - my own one and only one. :-). I see, that like so, I miss the intention of .ThenBy
.
How could List<T>
implement IOrderedEnumerable<T>
? It would have to provide a way of creating a subsequent ordering... what does that even mean?
Consider this:
var names = new List<string> { "Jon", "Holly", "Ash", "Robin", "William" };
var ordered = names.ThenBy(x => x.Length);
what does that even mean? There's no primary sort order (as there would be if I used names.OrderBy(x => x)
), so it's impossible to impose a secondary sort order.
I suggest you try creating your own implementation of IOrderedEnumerable<T>
based on a List<T>
- as you attempt to implement the CreateOrderedEnumerable
method, I think you'll see why it's inappropriate. You may find my [Edulinq blog post on IOrderedEnumerable<T>
] 1 useful.
Well, you are wrong: List<T>
is NOT ordered by a particular key. The elements inside the list are in the order you put them in. That's the reason, why List<T>
doesn't implement IOrderedEnumerable<T>
.
Just return the following:
ViewModel.SeriesRepository.OfType<T>().OrderBy(<your order predicate>);
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With