Menu
david4dev's answer to this question claims that there are three equivalent ways to convert an object to a JSON string using the json library:
JSON.dump(object)
JSON.generate(object)
object.to_json
and two equivalent ways to convert a JSON string to an object:
JSON.load(string)
JSON.parse(string)
But looking at the source code, each of them seems to be pretty much different, and there are some differences between them (e.g., 1).
What are the differences among them? When to use which?
455
Json.dump (): Used for writing the Python object i.e. dict to JSON file. For example, you have data in a list or dictionary or any Python object, and you want to encode and store it in a file in the form of JSON.
If we prefer working with files instead of strings, we may want to use json.dump () / json.load () to encode / decode JSON data using the data from the previous example: Here is another example (json.dump ()/json.load ()) using simpler data:
It is similar to the dictionary in Python. json module in Python module provides a method called dump () which converts the Python objects into appropriate json objects. It is a slight variant of dumps () method. The dump () method is used when the Python objects have to be stored in a file.
As we know, Python has a built-in package called JSON. There are few JSON methods which we use in our day-to-day task to process the JSON files. During this post we will be discussing about commonly used four methods e.g. ( json.load (),json.loads (),json.dump (),json.dumps () ).
TL;DR:
In general:
to_json (or the equivalent JSON::generate).JSON::parse.For some special use cases, you may want dump or load, but it's unsafe to use load on data you didn't create yourself.
Extended Explanation:
JSON::dump vs JSON::generate
As part of its argument signature, JSON::generate allows you to set options such as indent levels and whitespace particulars. JSON::dump, on the other hand, calls ::generate within itself, with specific pre-set options, so you lose the ability to set those yourself.
According to the docs, JSON::dump is meant to be part of the Marshal::dump implementation scheme. The main reason you'd want to explicitly use ::dump yourself would be that you are about to stream your JSON data (over a socket for instance), since ::dump allows you to pass an IO-like object as the second argument. Unfortunately, the JSON data being produced is not really streamed as it is produced; it is created en masse and only sent once the JSON is fully created. This makes having an IO argument useful only in trivial cases.
The final difference between the two is that ::dump can also take a limit argument that causes it to raise an ArgumentError when a certain nesting depth is exceeded.
Comparison to #to_json
#to_json accepts options as arguments, so internal implementation aside, JSON::generate(foo, opts) and foo.to_json(opts) are equivalent.
JSON::load vs JSON::parse
Similar to ::dump calling ::generate internally, ::load calls ::parse internally. ::load, like ::dump, may also take an IO object, but again, the source is read all at once, so streaming is limited to trivial cases. However, unlike the ::dump/::generate duality, both ::load and ::parse accept options as part of their argument signatures.
::load can also be passed a proc, which will be called on every Ruby object parsed from the data; it also comes with a warning that ::load should only be used with trusted data. ::parse has no such restriction, and therefore JSON::parse is the correct choice for parsing untrusted data sources like user inputs and files or streams with unknown contents.
166
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With
