Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

When do you use varargs in Java?

People also ask

What is the rule for using varargs in Java?

While using the varargs, you must follow some rules otherwise program code won't compile. The rules are as follows: There can be only one variable argument in the method. Variable argument (varargs) must be the last argument.

What is the difference between Varargs and array in Java?

The three dots can only be used in a method argument, and are called 'varargs'. It means you can pass in an array of parameters without explicitly creating the array. It's worth noting that the varargs are just sugar. The method actually takes an array, plain array.

Is Java Varargs an array?

Every time we use varargs, the Java compiler creates an array to hold the given parameters. In this case, the compiler creates an array with generic type components to hold the arguments. The varargs usage is safe if and only if: We don't store anything in the implicitly created array.

Can we use Varargs in abstract method?

So nope, the forwarder definitely isn't getting implemented. Putting the annotation on both bar methods fails to compile: A method with a varargs annotation produces a forwarder method with the same signature (args: Array[String])Unit as an existing method.


Varargs are useful for any method that needs to deal with an indeterminate number of objects. One good example is String.format. The format string can accept any number of parameters, so you need a mechanism to pass in any number of objects.

String.format("This is an integer: %d", myInt);
String.format("This is an integer: %d and a string: %s", myInt, myString);

A good rule of thumb would be:

"Use varargs for any method (or constructor) that needs an array of T (whatever type T may be) as input".

That will make calls to these methods easier (no need to do new T[]{...}).

You could extend this rule to include methods with a List<T> argument, provided that this argument is for input only (ie, the list is not modified by the method).

Additionally, I would refrain from using f(Object... args) because its slips towards a programming way with unclear APIs.

In terms of examples, I have used it in DesignGridLayout, where I can add several JComponents in one call:

layout.row().grid(new JLabel("Label")).add(field1, field2, field3);

In the code above the add() method is defined as add(JComponent... components).

Finally, the implementation of such methods must take care of the fact that it may be called with an empty vararg! If you want to impose at least one argument, then you have to use an ugly trick such as:

void f(T arg1, T... args) {...}

I consider this trick ugly because the implementation of the method will be less straightforward than having just T... args in its arguments list.

Hopes this helps clarifying the point about varargs.


I use varargs frequently for outputting to the logs for purposes of debugging.

Pretty much every class in my app has a method debugPrint():

private void debugPrint(Object... msg) {
    for (Object item : msg) System.out.print(item);
    System.out.println();
}

Then, within methods of the class, I have calls like the following:

debugPrint("for assignment ", hwId, ", student ", studentId, ", question ",
    serialNo, ", the grade is ", grade);

When I'm satisfied that my code is working, I comment out the code in the debugPrint() method so that the logs will not contain too much extraneous and unwanted information, but I can leave the individual calls to debugPrint() uncommented. Later, if I find a bug, I just uncomment the debugPrint() code, and all my calls to debugPrint() are reactivated.

Of course, I could just as easily eschew varargs and do the following instead:

private void debugPrint(String msg) {
    System.out.println(msg);
}

debugPrint("for assignment " + hwId + ", student " + studentId + ", question "
    + serialNo + ", the grade is " + grade);

However, in this case, when I comment out the debugPrint() code, the server still has to go through the trouble of concatenating all the variables in every call to debugPrint(), even though nothing is done with the resulting string. If I use varargs, however, the server only has to put them in an array before it realizes that it doesn't need them. Lots of time is saved.


Varargs can be used when we are unsure about the number of arguments to be passed in a method. It creates an array of parameters of unspecified length in the background and such a parameter can be treated as an array in runtime.

If we have a method which is overloaded to accept different number of parameters, then instead of overloading the method different times, we can simply use varargs concept.

Also when the parameters' type is going to vary then using "Object...test" will simplify the code a lot.

For example:

public int calculate(int...list) {
    int sum = 0;
    for (int item : list) {
        sum += item;
    }
    return sum;
}

Here indirectly an array of int type (list) is passed as parameter and is treated as an array in the code.

For a better understanding follow this link(it helped me a lot in understanding this concept clearly): http://www.javadb.com/using-varargs-in-java

P.S: Even I was afraid of using varargs when I didn't knw abt it. But now I am used to it. As it is said: "We cling to the known, afraid of the unknown", so just use it as much as you can and you too will start liking it :)


Varargs is the feature added in java version 1.5.

Why to use this?

  1. What if, you don't know the number of arguments to pass for a method?
  2. What if, you want to pass unlimited number of arguments to a method?

How this works?

It creates an array with the given arguments & passes the array to the method.

Example :

public class Solution {



    public static void main(String[] args) {
        add(5,7);
        add(5,7,9);
    }

    public static void add(int... s){
        System.out.println(s.length);
        int sum=0;
        for(int num:s)
            sum=sum+num;
        System.out.println("sum is "+sum );
    }

}

Output :

2

sum is 12

3

sum is 21