I have a list of elements '(a b c) and I want to find if (true or false) x is in it, where x can be 'a or 'd, for instance. Is there a built in function for this?
In contrast to Scheme's unstructured data types, such as symbols and numbers, lists are structures that contain other values as elements. A list is an ordered collection of values. In Scheme, lists can be heterogeneous, in that they may contain different kinds of values.
The append function joins two lists together to make one. The append function is built into Scheme. It concatenates two lists, that is to say, given two lists list1 and list2 it produces a new list which starts with the same elements as list1 and finishes with those of list2 .
car is an acronym from the phrase Contents of the Address part of the Register; and cdr is an acronym from the phrase Contents of the Decrement part of the Register. These phrases refer to specific pieces of hardware on the very early computer on which the Lisp language was developed.
If you need to compare using one of the build in equivalence operators, you can use memq
, memv
, or member
, depending on whether you want to look for equality using eq?
, eqv?
, or equal?
, respectively.
> (memq 'a '(a b c))
'(a b c)
> (memq 'b '(a b c))
'(b c)
> (memq 'x '(a b c))
#f
As you can see, these functions return the sublist starting at the first matching element if they find an element. This is because if you are searching a list that may contain booleans, you need to be able to distinguish the case of finding a #f
from the case of not finding the element you are looking for. A list is a true value (the only false value in Scheme is #f
) so you can use the result of memq
, memv
, or member
in any context expecting a boolean, such as an if
, cond
, and
, or or
expression.
> (if (memq 'a '(a b c))
"It's there! :)"
"It's not... :(")
"It's there! :)"
What is the difference between the three different functions? It's based on which equivalence function they use for comparison. eq?
(and thus memq
) tests if two objects are the same underlying object; it is basically equivalent to a pointer comparison (or direct value comparison in the case of integers). Thus, two strings or lists that look the same may not be eq?
, because they are stored in different locations in memory. equal?
(and thus member?
) performs a deep comparison on lists and strings, and so basically any two items that print the same will be equal?
. eqv?
is like eq?
for almost anything but numbers; for numbers, two numbers that are numerically equivalent will always be eqv?
, but they may not be eq?
(this is because of bignums and rational numbers, which may be stored in ways such that they won't be eq?
)
> (eq? 'a 'a)
#t
> (eq? 'a 'b)
#f
> (eq? (list 'a 'b 'c) (list 'a 'b 'c))
#f
> (equal? (list 'a 'b 'c) (list 'a 'b 'c))
#t
> (eqv? (+ 1/2 1/3) (+ 1/2 1/3))
#t
(Note that some behavior of the functions is undefined by the specification, and thus may differ from implementation to implementation; I have included examples that should work in any R5RS compatible Scheme that implements exact rational numbers)
If you need to search for an item in a list using an equivalence predicate different than one of the built in ones, then you may want find
or find-tail
from SRFI-1:
> (find-tail? (lambda (x) (> x 3)) '(1 2 3 4 5 6))
'(4 5 6)
Here's one way:
> (cond ((member 'a '(a b c)) '#t) (else '#f))
#t
> (cond ((member 'd '(a b c)) '#t) (else '#f))
#f
member returns everything starting from where the element is, or #f. A cond is used to convert this to true or false.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With