According to the standard, a conversion function has a function-id operator
conversion-type-id, which would look like, say, operator char(&)[4]
I believe. But I cannot figure out where to put the function parameter list. gcc does not accept either of operator char(&())[4]
or operator char(&)[4]()
or anything I can think of.
Now, gcc seems to accept (&operator char ())[4]
but clang does not, and I am inclined to not either, since it does not seem to fit the grammar as I understand it.
I do not want to use a typedef
because I want to avoid polluting the namespace with it.
To create an array, define the data type (like int ) and specify the name of the array followed by square brackets []. To insert values to it, use a comma-separated list, inside curly braces: int myNumbers[] = {25, 50, 75, 100};
Type Casting is also known as Type Conversion. For example, suppose the given data is an integer type, and we want to convert it into float type. So, we need to manually cast int data to the float type, and this type of casting is called the Type Casting in C++.
Implicit type conversion in C language is the conversion of one data type into another datatype by the compiler during the execution of the program. It is also called automatic type conversion.
Example 1: Conversion From int to double In the program, we have assigned an int data to a double variable. num_double = num_int; Here, the int value is automatically converted to double by the compiler before it is assigned to the num_double variable. This is an example of implicit type conversion.
You can use identity
template<typename T>
struct identity { typedef T type; };
struct sample {
operator identity<char[4]>::type &() {
...
}
};
You are correct that function and array declarators won't work in conversion functions. This is also known and discussed in this issue report. However i think that C++0x already provides a solution to what they discuss there
struct sample {
template<typename T>
using id = T;
template<typename T, int N>
operator id<T[N]> &() {
...
}
};
Unlike the identity
and typedef
approach, this allows T
and N
to be deduced, i think.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With