I am not interested in the contents of a row, I just want to know if a row exists. The Name
column is a primary key, so there will either be 0 or 1 matching rows. Currently, I am using:
if ((from u in dc.Users where u.Name == name select u).Count() > 0) // row exists else // row doesn't exist
While the above works, it does a lot of unnecessary work by selecting all the contents of the row (if it exists). Does the following create a faster query:
if (dc.Users.Where(u => u.Name == name).Any())
...or is there an even faster query?
More importantly: when it comes to querying databases, LINQ is in most cases a significantly more productive querying language than SQL. Compared to SQL, LINQ is simpler, tidier, and higher-level.
Most of the times, LINQ will be a bit slower because it introduces overhead. Do not use LINQ if you care much about performance. Use LINQ because you want shorter better readable and maintainable code. So your experience is that LINQ is faster and makes code harder to read and to maintain?
LINQ is absolutely 100% slower You are going to essentially "stall-out" if you are performing any complex queries, joins etc... total p.o.s for those types of functions/methods- just don't use it.
Of Course
if (dc.Users.Where(u => u.Name == name).Any())
this is best and if multiple conditions to check then it is very simple to write as
Say you want to check the user for company then
if (dc.Users.Where(u => u.ID== Id && u.Company==company).Any())
The Count()
approach may do extra work, as (in TSQL) EXISTS
or TOP 1
are often much quicker; the db can optimise "is there at least one row". Personally, I would use the any/predicate overload:
if (dc.Users.Any(u => u.Name == name)) {...}
Of course, you can compare what each one does by watching the TSQL:
dc.Log = Console.Out;
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With