They are syntactic sugar for two different things. The former initializes a backing field, and sets it to the expression on the right hand side of the assignment during field initialization. The latter creates a get
that does exactly what is in the expression.
public override bool CanRead { get; } = true;
is equivalent to
private readonly bool __backingFieldCanRead = true;
public override bool CanRead
{
get
{
return __backingFieldCanRead;
}
}
This
public override bool CanRead => true;
is equivalent to
public override bool CanRead
{
get
{
return true;
}
}
They behave differently. The first case sets the value of the property when the object is created and the field are initialized, the other case evaluates the expression every time the property's getter is invoked. In the simple case of a bool, the behavior is the same. However if the expression causes side effects, things are different. Consider this example:
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var fooBar1 = new FooBar();
Console.WriteLine(fooBar1.Baz);
Console.WriteLine(fooBar1.Baz);
var fooBar2 = new FooBar();
Console.WriteLine(fooBar2.Baz);
Console.WriteLine(fooBar2.Baz);
}
}
public class FooBar
{
private static int counter;
public int Baz => counter++;
}
Here, "0, 1, 2, 3" are printed. The static counter
field is incremented every time the property's getter is invoked. However, with a property initializer:
public int Baz { get; } = counter++;
Then "0, 0, 1, 1" is printed because the expression is evaluated in the object's constructor.
In the case you describe in our example, I used to prefer:
public override bool CanRead { get; } = true;
But today I notified that this implementation cause a memory allocation for the backing field. And so, this implementation: bool CanRead => true;
can save 4 bytes.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With