Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

What is more portable? echo -e or using printf?

I'm currently writing a bash testing framework, which requires to be as portable as possible.

So, at one point, I had to print a leading newline followed by some text which contains several expanded variables. This is the solution I've used.

echo -e "\n$number_of_specs ${units}, $number_of_specs_failed failed"

This seems okay but I'm not sure how portable that is compared to printing out the line using e.g. printf?

Any ideas or hints where I could find some references?

like image 290
helpermethod Avatar asked Jul 17 '12 20:07

helpermethod


1 Answers

printf is more portable. It should always be preferred over echo -e. If targeting bash/zsh/ksh specifically, echo $'...' is also ok. If targeting zsh or ksh specifically, print is ok.

  • http://cfajohnson.com/shell/cus-faq.html#Q0b
  • http://www.in-ulm.de/~mascheck/various/echo+printf/
  • http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/echo.html#tag_20_37_16

POSIX (last link) also discusses echo -n problems, which should also be avoided. Basically, never use options to echo, and for portability, use printf.)

like image 65
ormaaj Avatar answered Sep 22 '22 09:09

ormaaj