What is the difference between these 2 codes:
Arraylist<Integer> listofIntegers = new Arraylist<Integer>();
listofIntegers.add(666);
System.out.println("First Element of listofIntegers = " + listofIntegers.get(0));
And
Arraylist<Integer> listofIntegers = new Arraylist<Integer>();
listofIntegers.add(Integer.ValueOf(666));
System.out.println("First Element of listofIntegers = " + listofIntegers.get(0));
Both of them have the same output.
Thank you.
The boxing conversion uses Integer.valueOf
implicitly, so there's no difference between the two.
For example, consider this code:
public static void main(String[] args) {
Integer x = 100;
Integer y = Integer.valueOf(100);
}
The byte code for that (as shown by javap
) is:
public static void main(java.lang.String[]);
Code:
0: bipush 100
2: invokestatic #2 // Method java/lang/Integer.valueOf:(I)Ljava/lang/Integer;
5: astore_1
6: bipush 100
8: invokestatic #2 // Method java/lang/Integer.valueOf:(I)Ljava/lang/Integer;
11: astore_2
12: return
As you can see, the two pieces of code are identical.
Although the language specification section on boxing doesn't guarantee that it will be implemented by valueOf
, it does guarantee limited caching:
If the value
p
being boxed is the result of evaluating a constant expression (§15.28) of typeboolean
,char
,short
,int
,or long
, and the result is true, false, a character in the range '\u0000' to '\u007f' inclusive, or an integer in the range -128 to 127 inclusive, then leta
andb
be the results of any two boxing conversions ofp
. It is always the case thata == b
.
This is the same guarantee made by Integer.valueOf
.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With