How should I go if I want to iterate with a custom step in stable Rust? Essentially something like the C/C++
for (int i = 0; i < n; i += 2) {
}
I've already tried using range_step_inclusive
and the solutions in How do I iterate over a range with a custom step?:
use std::iter::range_step_inclusive;
for i in range_step_inclusive(0, n, 2) {
println!("i: {}", i);
}
But it seems like it isn't available in Rust 1.1:
error: unresolved import `std::iter::range_step_inclusive`. There is no `range_step_inclusive` in `std::iter`
What would be an alternative? Possibly the idiomatic way for creating custom ranges.
Iterator::step_by
is now stable:
fn main() {
for i in (0..100).step_by(2) {
println!("{}", i);
}
}
You can always write it out the old-fashioned way:
fn main() {
let mut i = 0;
while i < 100 {
println!("i: {}", i);
i += 2;
}
}
Which can then be abstracted:
use std::ops::Add;
fn step_by<T, F>(start: T, end_exclusive: T, step: T, mut body: F)
where
T: Add<Output = T> + PartialOrd + Copy,
F: FnMut(T),
{
let mut i = start;
while i < end_exclusive {
body(i);
i = i + step;
}
}
fn main() {
step_by(0, 100, 2, |i| {
println!("i: {}", i);
})
}
Interesting historical side note, I believe that originally all the looping was done with closures like this, before iterators became extremely prevalent.
You can then take this and make it into an iterator:
use std::ops::Add;
struct StepBy<T> {
start: T,
end_exclusive: T,
step: T,
}
impl<T> StepBy<T> {
fn new(start: T, end_exclusive: T, step: T) -> Self {
Self {
start,
end_exclusive,
step,
}
}
}
impl<T> Iterator for StepBy<T>
where
T: Add<Output = T> + PartialOrd + Copy,
{
type Item = T;
fn next(&mut self) -> Option<Self::Item> {
if self.start < self.end_exclusive {
let v = self.start;
self.start = self.start + self.step;
Some(v)
} else {
None
}
}
}
fn main() {
for i in StepBy::new(0, 100, 2) {
println!("i: {}", i);
}
}
See also:
There is way using let
"redefinition":
for i in 0..((n + 1) / 2) {
let i = i * 2;
// …
}
Or use Iterator::map
:
for i in (0..((n + 1) / 2)).map(|i| i * 2) {
// …
}
I think i'll stick to a while loop. But if you really want an iterator based method you could try this
fn main(){
let (start, step, end) = (1, 2, 20);
for i in (0..).map(|x| start+step*x)
.take_while(|&x| x<end){
println!("{:?}", i);
}
}
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With