What does it mean to align the stack?

Question

I have been a high-level coder, and architectures are pretty new to me, so I decided to read the tutorial on Assembly here:

http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/X86_Assembly/Print_Version

Far down the tutorial, instructions on how to convert the Hello World! program

#include <stdio.h>  int main(void) {     printf("Hello, world!\n");     return 0; } 

into equivalent assembly code was given and the following was generated:

        .text LC0:         .ascii "Hello, world!\12\0" .globl _main _main:         pushl   %ebp         movl    %esp, %ebp         subl    $8, %esp         andl    $-16, %esp         movl    $0, %eax         movl    %eax, -4(%ebp)         movl    -4(%ebp), %eax         call    __alloca         call    ___main         movl    $LC0, (%esp)         call    _printf         movl    $0, %eax         leave         ret 

For one of the lines,

andl    $-16, %esp 

the explanation was:

This code "and"s ESP with 0xFFFFFFF0, aligning the stack with the next lowest 16-byte boundary. An examination of Mingw's source code reveals that this may be for SIMD instructions appearing in the "_main" routine, which operate only on aligned addresses. Since our routine doesn't contain SIMD instructions, this line is unnecessary.

I do not understand this point. Can someone give me an explanation of what it means to align the stack with the next 16-byte boundary and why it is required? And how is the andl achieving this?

Answer 1

Assume the stack looks like this on entry to _main (the address of the stack pointer is just an example):

|    existing     | |  stack content  | +-----------------+  <--- 0xbfff1230 

Push %ebp, and subtract 8 from %esp to reserve some space for local variables:

|    existing     | |  stack content  | +-----------------+  <--- 0xbfff1230 |      %ebp       | +-----------------+  <--- 0xbfff122c :    reserved     : :     space       : +-----------------+  <--- 0xbfff1224 

Now, the andl instruction zeroes the low 4 bits of %esp, which may decrease it; in this particular example, it has the effect of reserving an additional 4 bytes:

|    existing     | |  stack content  | +-----------------+  <--- 0xbfff1230 |      %ebp       | +-----------------+  <--- 0xbfff122c :    reserved     : :     space       : + - - - - - - - - +  <--- 0xbfff1224 :   extra space   : +-----------------+  <--- 0xbfff1220 

The point of this is that there are some "SIMD" (Single Instruction, Multiple Data) instructions (also known in x86-land as "SSE" for "Streaming SIMD Extensions") which can perform parallel operations on multiple words in memory, but require those multiple words to be a block starting at an address which is a multiple of 16 bytes.

In general, the compiler can't assume that particular offsets from %esp will result in a suitable address (because the state of %esp on entry to the function depends on the calling code). But, by deliberately aligning the stack pointer in this way, the compiler knows that adding any multiple of 16 bytes to the stack pointer will result in a 16-byte aligned address, which is safe for use with these SIMD instructions.