Slick's support for HList
is generally a great thing. Unfortunately, it comes with its own implementation that does barely provide any useful operations. I'd therefore like to use the shapeless HList
instead. This is supposed to be "trivial", but I have no idea how to get this right. Searching the web I found no evidence that somebody managed to accomplish this task.
I assume that it's enough to implement a ProvenShape
(as advertised here), but since I fail to understand the concept of Slick's (Proven)Shape
s, I did not manage implement this.
I'm basically aiming to boil this
class Users( tag: Tag )
extends Table[Long :: String :: HNil]( tag, "users" )
{
def id = column[Long]( "id", O.PrimaryKey, O.AutoInc )
def email = column[String]( "email" )
override def * = ( id, email ) <>[TableElementType, ( Long, String )](
_.productElements,
hlist => Some( hlist.tupled )
)
}
down to
class Users( tag: Tag )
extends Table[Long :: String :: HNil]( tag, "users" )
{
def id = column[Long]( "id", O.PrimaryKey, O.AutoInc )
def email = column[String]( "email" )
override def * = id :: email :: HNil
}
You hit the nail on the head - if you can produce Shapes
for HLists
, the rest of Slick's machinery will kick into gear to produce the ProvenShape
you need for the default projection.
Here's a bare-bones implementation that allows you to create Tables
of HLists
:
import scala.annotation.tailrec
import scala.reflect.ClassTag
import shapeless.{ HList, ::, HNil }
import slick.lifted.{ Shape, ShapeLevel, MappedProductShape }
final class HListShape[L <: ShapeLevel, M <: HList, U <: HList : ClassTag, P <: HList]
(val shapes: Seq[Shape[_, _, _, _]]) extends MappedProductShape[L, HList, M, U, P] {
def buildValue(elems: IndexedSeq[Any]) =
elems.foldRight(HNil: HList)(_ :: _)
def copy(shapes: Seq[Shape[_ <: ShapeLevel, _, _, _]]) =
new HListShape(shapes)
def classTag: ClassTag[U] = implicitly
def runtimeList(value: HList): List[Any] = {
@tailrec def loop(value: HList, acc: List[Any] = Nil): List[Any] = value match {
case HNil => acc
case hd :: tl => loop(tl, hd :: acc)
}
loop(value).reverse
}
override def getIterator(value: HList): Iterator[Any] =
runtimeList(value).iterator
def getElement(value: HList, idx: Int): Any =
runtimeList(value)(idx)
}
object HListShape {
implicit def hnilShape[L <: ShapeLevel]: HListShape[L, HNil, HNil, HNil] =
new HListShape[L, HNil, HNil, HNil](Nil)
implicit def hconsShape[L <: ShapeLevel, M1, M2 <: HList, U1, U2 <: HList, P1, P2 <: HList]
(implicit s1: Shape[_ <: ShapeLevel, M1, U1, P1], s2: HListShape[_ <: ShapeLevel, M2, U2, P2]):
HListShape[L, M1 :: M2, U1 :: U2, P1 :: P2] =
new HListShape[L, M1 :: M2, U1 :: U2, P1 :: P2](s1 +: s2.shapes)
}
I've put an implementation on Github here. In principle I think Generic
could be brought into the fray to map case classes without the need for <>
.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With