I'm reading this section of the TypeScript documentation, under the generic types section, the following two are stated to be the equivalent:
Code Sample 1
function identity<T>(arg: T): T { return arg; } let myIdentity: <T>(arg: T) => T = identity;
Code Sample 2
function identity<T>(arg: T): T { return arg; } let myIdentity: {<T>(arg: T): T} = identity;
The documentation states this is possible due to the following.
We can also write the generic type as a call signature of an object literal type
Despite this line I'm still struggling to understand how the two are equivalent, is there any further documentation or explanation of what it means to be 'a call signature of an object literal type'.
I'm sorry I can't give any further explanation but I'm completely drawing a blank as to how the two are equivalent, to me the second type definition states that myIdentity should be an object?
Thanks.
In TypeScript we can express its type as: ( a : number , b : number ) => number. This is TypeScript's syntax for a function's type, or call signature (also called a type signature). You'll notice it looks remarkably similar to an arrow function—this is intentional!
They are a comma-separated list of name-value pairs. Think of JSON Objects. Below is an Object Literal which contains the information for a user. An example of an Object Literal. Let's look at different ways to declare object literals in TypeScript and some caveats associated with them.
Generics offer a way to create reusable components. Generics provide a way to make components work with any data type and not restrict to one data type. So, components can be called or used with a variety of data types. Generics in TypeScript is almost similar to C# generics.
Today I will describe how to write type signatures for a wide range of javascript functions. This will help readers narrow types, increase reliability, type dependencies, and more. A type signature is like a blueprint for any given segment of code.
Functions can have properties, that's what the object literal syntax is for: it allows to define a call signature and additional properties. Your two examples are equivalent because the second doesn't define additional properties on the object literal. You can read more on that in the section on hybrid types.
Additionally, the object literal allows to define multiple call signatures for function overloads. You can create an object of such an interface with Object.assign
:
interface Foo { (x: string): number, (x: number): string, bar: Array<any>, } const foo: Foo = Object.assign(function (x: any) { if (typeof x === 'string') { return parseInt(x); } else { return x.toString(); } }, { bar: [] });
It is because Function
in JavaScript is also an object.
Consider the following:
function foo() { return 'foo' } // vs const foo = Object.assign( function () { return 'foo' }, {} )
TypeScript just follows what is possible in JavaScript.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With