I have code which is differently interpreted by g++ with the c++14
and c++17
standard flags:
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
template<class T, class A>
void func(const std::vector<T, A>&v)
{
std::cout << 1 << std::endl;
}
template<typename T, template <typename>class Vector>
void func(const Vector<T>&v)
{
std::cout << 2 << std::endl;
}
void f()
{
std::vector<int> v;
func(v);
}
int main()
{
f();
return 0;
}
When I'm trying compile this code with command
g++ -std=c++14 -Wall -pedantic main.cpp
everything works just fine.
But when I'm trying to compile this code with command
g++ -std=c++17 -Wall -pedantic main.cpp
I get this error:
main.cpp: In function 'void f()':
main.cpp:19:11: error: call of overloaded 'func(std::vector<int>&)' is ambiguous
func(v);
^
main.cpp:5:6: note: candidate: 'void func(const std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>&) [with T = int; A = std::allocator<int>]'
void func(const std::vector<T, A>&v)
^~~~
main.cpp:11:6: note: candidate: 'void func(const Vector<T>&) [with T = int; Vector = std::vector]'
void func(const Vector<T>&v)
I can't figure out what is wrong with this code from the C++17 standard's point of view.
You cannot give default arguments to the same template parameters in different declarations in the same scope. The compiler will not allow the following example: template<class T = char> class X; template<class T = char> class X { };
Can default arguments be used with the template class? Explanation: The template class can use default arguments.
Template non-type arguments in C++It is also possible to use non-type arguments (basic/derived data types) i.e., in addition to the type argument T, it can also use other arguments such as strings, function names, constant expressions, and built-in data types.
Class Template Argument Deduction (CTAD) is a C++17 Core Language feature that reduces code verbosity. C++17's Standard Library also supports CTAD, so after upgrading your toolset, you can take advantage of this new feature when using STL types like std::pair and std::vector.
The behavior changed since C++17.
Before C++17, the code works because std::vector
has two template parameters (the 2nd one has the default argument std::allocator<T>
), while the template template parameter Vector
is declared to have only one, they don't match then the 2nd func
won't be considered.
Since C++17 (CWG 150), the default template arguments are allowed for a template template argument to match a template template parameter with fewer template parameters. That means both func
become valid candidates and then leads to ambiguity.
template<class T> class A { /* ... */ }; template<class T, class U = T> class B { /* ... */ }; template<template<class> class P> class X { /* ... */ }; X<A> xa; // OK X<B> xb; // OK in C++17 after CWG 150 // Error earlier: not an exact match
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With